Ming David, Zietlow Kahli, Song Yao, Lee Hui-Jie, Clay Alison
Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Clin Teach. 2019 Oct;16(5):507-512. doi: 10.1111/tct.12960. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
Resident physicians at teaching hospitals write many discharge summaries (DCSs), but receive little formal training or feedback. Poor DCS quality poses a potential patient safety risk.
We developed a curriculum to train fourth-year medical students (MS4s) how to write DCSs and integrated this curriculum into a transition-to-residency course. An inpatient attending physician (IPA) and non-inpatient physician (coach) used structured tools to assess for the presence of key elements within the DCS, evaluate the overall quality of the DCS, and judge the student's progression towards entrustable professional activities and transitional year milestones. We identified overall areas of weakness and correlated scores between IPAs and coaches. Improvements in student knowledge and DCS writing confidence were determined using pre- and post-curriculum surveys.
Of 102 eligible students, 78 completed the assignment, 61 wrote a new DCS and 17 reviewed previously written DCSs. Patient condition at discharge was missing in more than 20.0% of DCSs. Coaches were less likely than IPAs to assess students as entrustable (58.3% versus 95.8%; p = 0.0027). IPAs assigned higher overall quality ratings than coaches (8.0 versus 6.0 out of 10.0, p< 0.0001). Post-intervention, 82.2% of students reported they learned how to write high-quality DCSs and 93.3% of students reported they would change the way they write DCSs.
Graduating medical students have limited skill and comfort in writing DCSs. Structured training on how to write DCSs before postgraduate residency training is a key step towards ultimately improving transitions of care. Training should teach learners to write high-quality DCSs that serve the needs of both inpatient and outpatient providers. Resident physicians at teaching hospitals are expected to independently author [discharge summaries] DCSs, yet few receive formal training.
教学医院的住院医师撰写大量出院小结(DCS),但很少接受正规培训或反馈。DCS质量差会带来潜在的患者安全风险。
我们制定了一门课程,培训四年级医学生(MS4)如何撰写DCS,并将该课程纳入住院医师过渡课程。一名住院主治医师(IPA)和一名非住院医师(教练)使用结构化工具评估DCS中关键要素的存在情况,评估DCS的整体质量,并判断学生在可托付专业活动和过渡年里程碑方面的进展。我们确定了总体薄弱环节,并比较了IPA和教练之间的评分。通过课程前后的调查来确定学生知识和DCS撰写信心的提高情况。
在102名符合条件的学生中,78名完成了任务,61名撰写了新的DCS,17名审查了之前撰写的DCS。超过20.0%的DCS中缺少出院时的患者病情。与IPA相比,教练将学生评估为可托付的可能性较小(58.3%对95.8%;p = 0.0027)。IPA给出的总体质量评分高于教练(10分制中分别为8.0分和6.0分,p < 0.0001)。干预后,82.2%的学生报告他们学会了如何撰写高质量的DCS,93.3%的学生报告他们会改变撰写DCS的方式。
即将毕业的医学生在撰写DCS方面技能有限且不够自信。在研究生住院医师培训之前,进行关于如何撰写DCS的结构化培训是最终改善医疗护理过渡的关键一步。培训应教导学习者撰写高质量的DCS,以满足住院和门诊医护人员的需求。教学医院的住院医师预计要独立撰写[出院小结]DCS,但很少有人接受正规培训。