Brad Beauvais, PhD, MBA, FACHE, is Assistant Professor, Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas. E-mail:
Health Care Manage Rev. 2021 Jan/Mar;46(1):66-74. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000227.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Value-based purchasing (VBP) is increasing in influence in the health care industry; however, questions remain regarding the structural factors associated with improved performance. This study evaluates the association between age of hospital infrastructure and VBP outcomes.
Data on 1,911 hospitals from three sources (the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database, the American Hospital Association DataViewer Financial Module, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital VBP Total Performance Scores data set) were evaluated. Age of health care facilities was represented by the "average age of plant" financial ratio. VBP performance was measured by an aggregate Total Performance Score composed of four equally weighted domains, including Efficiency and Cost Reduction, Clinical Care, Patient- and Caregiver-Centered Experience, and Patient Safety. We hypothesize that average age of plant is negatively correlated with each of these measures.
Hospitals within the lowest quartile of average age of plant (0-8.13 years) were found to have a total Performance Score of 2.35 points higher than hospitals with a an average age of plant in the fourth quartile (14.63 years and above; R = 21.5%; p < .001) while controlling for hospital ownership, size, teaching status, geographic location, service mix, case mix, length of stay, community served, and labor force relative cost. Comparable results were found within the VBP domains, specifically for Clinical Care (β = 4.09, p < .001) and Patient Experience (β = 3.41, p < .001). Findings for the Patient Safety and Efficiency domains were not significant. A secondary and more granular examination of capitalized assets indicates organizations with higher building asset accumulated depreciation per bed in service were associated with lower total performance (β = -.25, p < .001), Clinical Care (β = -.31, p < .05), and Patient Experience scores (β = -.45, p < .001).
The results of this study provide evidence of an inverse association between a hospital's age of plant and specific elements of VBP performance.
To date, no studies have investigated the relationship between hospital age of plant and value-based care. The results of our study may serve as supportive foundational evidence for health care leaders to target future capital investments to improve VBP outcomes.
背景/目的:基于价值的采购(VBP)在医疗保健行业的影响力日益增强;然而,对于与绩效提高相关的结构因素仍存在疑问。本研究评估了医院基础设施的年龄与 VBP 结果之间的关联。
评估了来自三个来源的数据(美国医院协会年度调查数据库、美国医院协会数据查看器财务模块和医疗保险和医疗补助服务医院 VBP 总绩效评分数据集),1911 家医院的数据。医疗设施的年龄通过“工厂平均年龄”财务比率来表示。VBP 绩效通过由四个同等权重的领域组成的综合总绩效评分来衡量,包括效率和成本降低、临床护理、患者和护理人员为中心的体验以及患者安全。我们假设工厂的平均年龄与这些措施都呈负相关。
在工厂平均年龄最低的四分之一(0-8.13 年)中,发现总绩效评分比第四四分位数(14.63 年及以上)的医院高 2.35 分(R = 21.5%;p<.001),同时控制了医院所有权、规模、教学状态、地理位置、服务组合、病例组合、住院时间、服务社区和劳动力相对成本。在 VBP 领域也发现了类似的结果,特别是在临床护理(β=4.09,p<.001)和患者体验(β=3.41,p<.001)方面。患者安全和效率领域的结果则不显著。对资本化资产的二次和更细致的检查表明,单位床位累计折旧较高的医疗机构与总绩效(β=-0.25,p<.001)、临床护理(β=-0.31,p<.05)和患者体验评分(β=-0.45,p<.001)较低相关。
本研究结果提供了医院设施年龄与 VBP 绩效特定要素之间存在反比关系的证据。
迄今为止,尚无研究调查医院年龄与基于价值的护理之间的关系。我们研究的结果可能为医疗保健领导者提供支持性的基础证据,以将未来的资本投资瞄准提高 VBP 结果。