Suppr超能文献

在加拿大农林复合系统中,引入树木会增加春季融雪期间的温室气体排放。

Introducing trees to agricultural lands increases greenhouse gas emission during spring thaw in Canadian agroforestry systems.

机构信息

Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.

Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada; Bio R&D Center, CJ Cheiljedang, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16495, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 20;652:800-809. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.241. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

Abstract

The role of agroforestry systems in mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emission from agricultural soils during spring thaw (early April to mid-May) has been poorly studied. Soil CO, CH and NO fluxes were measured from treed areas and adjacent herblands (areas without trees) during spring thaw in 2014 and 2015 at 36 agroforestry sites (12 hedgerow, 12 shelterbelt and 12 silvopasture) in central Alberta, Canada. Fluxes of those GHGs varied with agroforestry systems and land-cover types. We found greater CO emission (P < 0.001) and CH uptake (P < 0.05), but lower NO emission (P < 0.01) in the silvopasture than in the hedgerow and shelterbelt systems, with no difference between the last two systems. Treed areas in general had greater CO emissions (P < 0.001) and CH uptake (P < 0.01), and lower NO emissions (P < 0.001) than the herblands. Soil temperature, moisture content, organic C content and soil available N concentration affected GHG fluxes. The global warming potential (GWP) was greater (P < 0.05) in the silvopasture than in the hedgerow or shelterbelt systems over the two spring thaw seasons examined, and greater (P < 0.05) in the treed areas than in the herblands during the cool spring in 2015. However, the GWP per unit soil organic C was lower in the treed areas (0.004-0.101%) than in the herblands (0.005-0.225%). As compared to previously reported mean growing season GHG emission (15.4 g CO-eq m day), the GWP of these land uses during spring thaw was small (<5% of the annual GWP) due to the short spring period (6 weeks) and the small GHG emission (2.5 g CO-eq m day). Although GHG emissions during spring thaw were small compared to those in the growing season, they should not be ignored.

摘要

在春季解冻期间(4 月初至 5 月中旬),农林系统在减少农业土壤温室气体(GHG)排放方面的作用研究甚少。在 2014 年和 2015 年,对加拿大阿尔伯塔省中部 36 个农林系统(12 个树篱、12 个防风林和 12 个林牧系统)的树木区和相邻草地(无树地区)进行了春季解冻期间的土壤 CO、CH 和 NO 通量测量。这些 GHG 的通量随农林系统和土地覆盖类型而变化。我们发现,与树篱和防风林系统相比,林牧系统具有更高的 CO 排放(P<0.001)和 CH 吸收(P<0.05),但 NO 排放更低(P<0.01),后两个系统之间没有差异。一般来说,树木区的 CO 排放(P<0.001)和 CH 吸收(P<0.01)较高,NO 排放较低(P<0.001),而与草地相比则没有差异。土壤温度、含水量、有机 C 含量和土壤有效 N 浓度影响 GHG 通量。在研究的两个春季解冻季节中,林牧系统的全球变暖潜势(GWP)高于树篱或防风林系统(P<0.05),而在 2015 年春季较冷的时期,树木区的 GWP 高于草地(P<0.05)。然而,与以前报道的平均生长季节 GHG 排放(15.4g CO-eq m day)相比,树木区的单位土壤有机 C 的 GWP 较低(0.004-0.101%),而草地的 GWP 较高(0.005-0.225%)。由于春季持续时间短(6 周)和 GHG 排放量小(2.5g CO-eq m day),与生长季节相比,这些土地利用方式在春季解冻期间的 GWP 较小(<年度 GWP 的 5%)。尽管与生长季节相比,春季解冻期间的 GHG 排放较小,但不应忽视。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验