The Orthopaedic Clinic, Mercy Specialist Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.
Medtronic Spine, Memphis, Tennessee.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 15;43(22):E1350-E1357. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002705.
Controlled cadaveric study of surgical technique in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF and PLIF) OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the contribution of surgical techniques and cage variables in lordosis recreation in posterior interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF).
The major contributors to lumbar lordosis are the lordotic lower lumbar discs. The pathologies requiring treatment with segmental fusion are frequently hypolordotic or kyphotic. Current posterior based interbody techniques have a poor track record for recreating lordosis, although recreation of lordosis with optimum anatomical alignment is associated with better outcomes and reduced adjacent segment change needing revision. It is unclear whether surgical techniques or cage parameters contribute significantly to lordosis recreation.
Eight instrumented cadaveric motion segments were evaluated with pre and post experimental radiological assessment of lordosis. Each motion segment was instrumented with pedicle screw fixation to allow segmental stabilization. The surgical procedures were unilateral TLIF with an 18° lordotic and 27 mm length cage, unilateral TLIF (18°, 27 mm) with bilateral facetectomy, unilateral TLIF (18°, 27 mm) with posterior column osteotomy (PCO), PLIF with bilateral cages (18°, 22 mm), and PLIF with bilateral cages (24°, 22 mm). Cage insertion used and "insert and rotate" technique.
Pooled results demonstrated a mean increase in lordosis of 2.2° with each procedural step (lordosis increase was serially 1.8°, 3.5°, 1.6°, 2.5°, and 1.6° through the procedures). TLIF and PLIF with PCO increased lordosis significantly compared with unilateral TLIF and TLIF with bilateral facetectomy. The major contributors to lordosis recreation were PCO, and PLIF with paired shorter cages rather than TLIF.
This study demonstrates that the surgical approach to posterior interbody surgery influences lordosis gain and PCO optimizes lordosis gain in TLIF. The bilateral cages used in PLIF are shorter and associated with further gain in lordosis. This information has the potential to aid surgical planning when attempting to recreate lordosis to optimize outcomes.
N/A.
经椎间孔和后路腰椎体间融合术(TLIF 和 PLIF)手术技术的对照尸体研究。
评估手术技术和 cage 变量在后路腰椎体间融合术(TLIF/PLIF)中对脊柱前凸重建的影响。
腰椎前凸的主要贡献者是前凸的下腰椎间盘。需要进行节段性融合治疗的病变通常是低前凸或后凸。目前基于后路的椎间技术在重建前凸方面效果不佳,尽管与最佳解剖对线重建前凸与更好的结果相关,并减少需要翻修的相邻节段变化,但不清楚手术技术或 cage 参数是否对前凸重建有显著影响。
对 8 个经器械固定的尸体运动节段进行评估,在实验前和实验后进行前凸的放射学评估。每个运动节段均采用椎弓根螺钉固定以实现节段稳定。手术程序为单侧 TLIF 采用 18°前凸和 27mm 长 cage、单侧 TLIF(18°,27mm)联合双侧关节突切除术、单侧 TLIF(18°,27mm)联合后柱截骨术(PCO)、双侧 cage 的 PLIF(18°,22mm)和双侧 cage 的 PLIF(24°,22mm)。采用 cage 插入和“插入和旋转”技术。
汇总结果显示,每个手术步骤平均增加前凸 2.2°(前凸增加依次为 1.8°、3.5°、1.6°、2.5°和 1.6°)。TLIF 和 PCO 的 PLIF 与单侧 TLIF 和 TLIF 联合双侧关节突切除术相比,前凸增加显著。前凸重建的主要贡献者是 PCO 和 PLIF 联合使用较短的配对 cage,而不是 TLIF。
本研究表明,后路椎间手术的手术入路影响前凸增加,PCO 可优化 TLIF 中的前凸增加。PLIF 中使用的双侧较短 cage 进一步增加了前凸。这些信息有可能在试图重建前凸以优化结果时,为手术计划提供帮助。
N/A。