• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

车载生态安全驾驶系统对驾驶员扫视行为的影响。

Effects of an in-vehicle eco-safe driving system on drivers' glance behaviour.

机构信息

Center for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland (CARRS-Q), Queensland University of Technology, 130 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, 4059, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, 4059, Australia.

Center for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland (CARRS-Q), Queensland University of Technology, 130 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, 4059, Australia; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, 4059, Australia; RECOVER Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, 4006, Australia.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.007
PMID:30384084
Abstract

We have designed a new in-vehicle eco-safe driving system and shown its effectiveness in prompting drivers to execute a fuel-saving and safe driving style (Vaezipour et al., 2018, submitted for publication). However, the system could also bring potential negative outcomes, i.e. driver distraction. This simulator study investigated drivers' glance behaviours as indicators of driver distraction when using our Eco-Safe Human-Machine-Interface (HMI). Four types of eco-safe information display conditions (baseline, advice only, feedback only, both advice and feedback) were tested on different traffic situations with varied road traffic complexity. Results showed that the eco-safe HMI system did not cause visual distraction. In contrast, the advice only or feedback only information improved forward gazing on the roadway. In addition, drivers tended to adapt their visual scanning strategies according to the traffic situations. In the car-following situation they paid longer glances to the forward roadway, while in the intersections they spent more time to look at the HMI system. The findings indicated that our eco-safe driving system improved drivers' eco-safe behaviours and meanwhile enhanced their visual attention on road while no evidence showed that drivers were distracted by it.

摘要

我们设计了一种新的车载生态安全驾驶系统,并证明其在促使驾驶员采取节油和安全驾驶方式方面的有效性(Vaezipour 等人,2018 年,已提交出版)。然而,该系统也可能带来潜在的负面后果,即驾驶员分神。本模拟器研究调查了驾驶员在使用我们的生态安全人机界面(HMI)时的目光行为,以此作为驾驶员分神的指标。在不同的交通情况下,针对不同的道路交通复杂度,测试了四种生态安全信息显示条件(基线、仅提示、仅反馈、提示和反馈)。结果表明,生态安全 HMI 系统不会造成视觉分神。相反,仅提示或仅反馈信息会提高驾驶员对道路前方的注视。此外,驾驶员倾向于根据交通情况调整其视觉扫描策略。在跟车情况下,他们会将更多的时间用于注视前方道路,而在交叉口时,他们会将更多的时间用于查看 HMI 系统。研究结果表明,我们的生态安全驾驶系统改善了驾驶员的生态安全行为,同时增强了他们对道路的视觉注意力,没有证据表明驾驶员因此而分心。

相似文献

1
Effects of an in-vehicle eco-safe driving system on drivers' glance behaviour.车载生态安全驾驶系统对驾驶员扫视行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.乐观的看法:在“百车”数据中,行车时的扫视指标能区分撞车事故和险些撞车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
3
Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving.探究驾驶员在使用车载人机界面进行生态安全驾驶时的心理负荷和视觉需求。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105756. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105756. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.考察分心驾驶时驾驶员的眼动模式:来自扫视随机性和眼跳转换矩阵的洞察。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
6
The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.短暂视觉中断任务对驾驶员恢复对预提示危险进行视觉搜索能力的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study.使用视觉生态驾驶系统时扫视行为的变化——一项实地研究。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:414-423. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
Drivers' gap acceptance behaviours at intersections: A driving simulator study to understand the impact of mobile phone visual-manual interactions.驾驶员在交叉口的视距接受行为:一项驾驶模拟器研究,旨在了解手机视觉-手动交互的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Apr;138:105486. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105486. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.比较真实环境和模拟环境中驾驶员在交叉口处的视觉注意力。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:89-101. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 25.
10
Chinese handwriting while driving: Effects of handwritten box size on in-vehicle information systems usability and driver distraction.中文手写输入驾驶时:手写框大小对车载信息系统可用性和驾驶员分心的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(1):26-31. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2126936. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye tracking use in researching driver distraction: A scientometric and qualitative literature review approach.眼动追踪技术在研究驾驶员分心方面的应用:一种科学计量学与定性文献综述方法
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Sep 30;12(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.3.5.