• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认证和授权预防医学医师。

Credentialing and privileging the preventive medicine physician.

机构信息

American College of Preventive Medicine, Washington, DC, United States of America.

University of Maryland, School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States of America.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:166-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.015
PMID:30385153
Abstract

The practice of preventive medicine remains ill-defined, and the specialty is threatened by a void in the definition of the specialty's practice. The authors propose a cohesive, active identification of skills provided by trained preventive medicine physicians through the credentialing and privileging process. The privileging process should incorporate clinical skills specific to the provider and non-clinical skills based on preventive medicine residency training competency requirements, preventive medicine board certification examination requirements, and the ten essential public health services. The specialty may benefit from development of clinical training based on public health clinical services as well as privileging of physicians in health organization leadership positions.

摘要

预防医学的实践仍然缺乏明确的定义,该专业正受到专业实践定义空白的威胁。作者通过认证和特权程序,提出了一个连贯的、积极的方法来确定经过培训的预防医学医生提供的技能。特权程序应包括基于提供者的临床技能和基于预防医学住院医师培训能力要求、预防医学委员会认证考试要求以及十大公共卫生服务的非临床技能。该专业可能受益于基于公共卫生临床服务的临床培训的发展,以及在卫生组织领导职位上赋予医生特权。

相似文献

1
Credentialing and privileging the preventive medicine physician.认证和授权预防医学医师。
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:166-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
2
Bringing science and rationality to privileging and credentialing issues.将科学与理性引入特权授予和资质认定问题。
Am Fam Physician. 1995 Sep 1;52(3):785, 789-90.
3
American Society for Apheresis white paper: considerations for medical staff apheresis medicine physician credentialing and privileging.美国血液单采学会白皮书:医务人员血液单采医学医师资格认证与授权的考量因素
J Clin Apher. 2012;27(6):330-5. doi: 10.1002/jca.21250. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
4
Privileging and credentialing for interventional cardiology procedures.介入心脏病学手术的特权授予与资质认定
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;86(4):655-63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25793. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
5
Credentialing and privileging of pharmacists: a resource paper from the Council on Credentialing in Pharmacy.药剂师的资格认证与权限授予:来自药学资格认证委员会的一份参考文件
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2014 Nov-Dec;54(6):e354-64. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2014.14545.
6
Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy.内镜检查和结肠镜检查的特权授予与资质认定原则
Surg Endosc. 2002 Feb;16(2):367-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-0073-8. Epub 2002 Jan 17.
7
Role of clinical examinations in the future of credentialing and clinical privileging.临床检查在未来资质认定和临床特权授予中的作用。
Optom Vis Sci. 1996 May;73(5):350-1. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199605000-00016.
8
Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians for sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂骶棘韧带固定术医生权限授予与资质认定指南。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):62-5. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318289c018.
9
Interventional pain physicians' experiences of and attitudes toward surgical privileging.介入疼痛医师的手术特权体验和态度。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):457-60. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318219e23e.
10
Robotically Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Proposed Guidelines for Privileging and Credentialing.机器人辅助胸外科手术:授予权限和认定资质的拟议指南。
Innovations (Phila). 2016 Nov/Dec;11(6):386-389. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000320.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Health and General Preventive Medicine Training: A National Survey.公共卫生与一般预防医学培训:一项全国性调查。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Mar 8;26:101754. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101754. eCollection 2022 Apr.