Silva Francinaldo Soares, Costa-Neta Benedita Maria, de Sousa de Almeida Mayara, de Araújo Eudimara Carvalho, Aguiar João Vitor Castro
Laboratory of Medical Entomology, Center for Agrarian and Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha, MA, 65500-000, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, CEP: 65080-805. São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, CEP: 65080-805, São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil.
Laboratory of Medical Entomology, Center for Agrarian and Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha, MA, 65500-000, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, CEP: 65080-805. São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil.
Acta Trop. 2019 Feb;190:9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
In this paper, a non-powered trap equipped with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) designed for capturing small night-flying insects was field-evaluated for sampling anopheline mosquitoes. This new light trap, referred to as the Silva trap, was compared with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) miniature light trap in a livestock area in northeastern Brazil. Light traps were operated from 18:00 to 06:00 between July and August 2018, over a 12-night period. A total of 3124 specimens and eight species were collected. Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) argyritarsis was the prevalent species, followed by A. (Nys) triannulatus s.l., A. (Nys) goeldii, A. (Nys) evansae, A. (Nys) rangeli, A. (Nys) galvaoi, A. (Nys) darlingi and A. (Nys) albitarsis s.l. The total number of anopheline mosquitoes captured with the Silva trap was higher than the number of individuals captured with the CDC light trap, but no significant difference between the two trapping methods was found. Concerning the damaged specimens, the Silva trap damaged significantly less mosquitoes than the CDC light trap. According to these results, the Silva trap has acceptable performance in being an efficient tool for sampling anopheline mosquitoes, mainly in comparison with the CDC light trap. The Silva trap has a number of advantages over other trapping devices that collect questing mosquitoes and these advantages are pointed out and discussed.
本文对一种配备发光二极管(LED)的无动力诱捕器进行了实地评估,该诱捕器旨在捕获小型夜间飞行昆虫,用于采集按蚊。这种新的光诱捕器被称为席尔瓦诱捕器,在巴西东北部的一个畜牧区与疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)微型光诱捕器进行了比较。2018年7月至8月期间,在12个夜晚的18:00至06:00运行光诱捕器。共采集到3124个标本和8个物种。银色按蚊(Nyssorhynchus)是优势种,其次是三带按蚊(Nys)复合组、戈氏按蚊(Nys)、埃氏按蚊(Nys)、兰氏按蚊(Nys)、加尔瓦按蚊(Nys)、达林按蚊(Nys)和白跗按蚊(Nys)复合组。席尔瓦诱捕器捕获的按蚊总数高于CDC光诱捕器捕获的个体数量,但两种诱捕方法之间未发现显著差异。关于受损标本,席尔瓦诱捕器损坏的蚊子明显少于CDC光诱捕器。根据这些结果,席尔瓦诱捕器作为一种采集按蚊样本的有效工具具有可接受的性能,主要是与CDC光诱捕器相比。席尔瓦诱捕器相对于其他捕获寻找宿主蚊子的诱捕装置有许多优点,并指出和讨论了这些优点。