From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.R.M., G.J., D.G.)
Neurosurgery (M.J.K., E.J.L., G.C., S.J., A.P.W., G.J., E.F.A., J.M.S., D.G.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Dec;39(12):2270-2277. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5863. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
Although covered side branches typically remain patent acutely following Pipeline Embolization Device embolization of intracranial aneurysms, the long-term fate of these vessels remains uncertain. We therefore elected to investigate factors that may influence the long-term patency of these covered side branches.
We retrospectively evaluated the long-term patency of side branches covered by the Pipeline Embolization Device at our institution during treatment of intracranial aneurysms with at least 6 months of conventional angiography follow-up. Procedural and anatomic factors that might influence the fate of covered side branches were explored.
One hundred forty-eight Pipeline Embolization Device treatments in 137 patients met the inclusion criteria. In 217 covered side branches, 29 (13.4%) were occluded on follow-up, and 40 (18.4%) were stenotic. All stenoses and occlusions were asymptomatic. In the entire cohort and in the largest subset of ophthalmic arteries, a smaller Pipeline Embolization Device diameter was associated with branch vessel occlusion ( = .001, = .013). When we considered stenotic and occluded side branches together, smaller Pipeline Embolization Device size ( = .029) and administration of intraprocedural abciximab ( = .03) predicted side branch stenosis/occlusion, while anterior choroidal branch type ( = .003) was a predictor of gross side branch patency.
A smaller Pipeline Embolization Device diameter is associated with delayed side branch stenosis/occlusion following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment, likely due to the higher metal density of smaller caliber devices. Although hemodynamic factors, including the potential for collateral flow, are still paramount in determining the fate of covered side branches, the amount of metal coverage at the side branch orifice also plays an important role.
尽管颅内动脉瘤Pipeline 栓塞装置栓塞后,覆盖的侧支通常在急性期保持通畅,但这些血管的长期通畅情况仍不确定。因此,我们选择研究可能影响这些覆盖的侧支长期通畅性的因素。
我们回顾性评估了在我院使用 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤患者的侧支分支的长期通畅性,这些患者的常规血管造影随访时间至少为 6 个月。探讨了可能影响覆盖的侧支分支命运的程序和解剖因素。
137 例患者的 148 次 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗符合纳入标准。在 217 个被覆盖的侧支中,29 个(13.4%)在随访时闭塞,40 个(18.4%)狭窄。所有狭窄和闭塞均无症状。在整个队列和最大的眼动脉亚组中,较小的 Pipeline 栓塞装置直径与分支血管闭塞相关( =.001, =.013)。当我们将狭窄和闭塞的侧支一起考虑时,较小的 Pipeline 栓塞装置尺寸( =.029)和术中给予 abciximab( =.03)预测侧支狭窄/闭塞,而前脉络膜支类型( =.003)是侧支总体通畅的预测因素。
较小的 Pipeline 栓塞装置直径与 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗后侧支狭窄/闭塞的延迟有关,这可能是由于较小口径装置的金属密度较高所致。尽管血流动力学因素,包括侧支血流的潜在因素,在决定覆盖的侧支分支的命运方面仍然至关重要,但侧支开口处的金属覆盖量也起着重要作用。