• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疝修补大型注册登记数据解读中的陷阱。

Pitfalls in interpretation of large registry data on hernia repair.

作者信息

Schwab R, Dietz U A, Menzel S, Wiegering A

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital of Koblenz, Ruebenacherstrasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.

Department of Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Kantonsspital Olten, Baselstrasse 150, 4600, Olten, Switzerland.

出版信息

Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):947-950. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1837-6. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-018-1837-6
PMID:30386922
Abstract

Since more and more hernia registries are being created and the number of patients included is increasing, knowledge of potential pitfalls in interpretation of registry data has to be known and dealt with. This invited commentary is to discuss some of these topics. The aim is to present and discuss the main shortcoming of register-based studies and how to deal with these problems, to contribute to more validated results and eventually improved surgical outcomes.

摘要

由于越来越多的疝登记系统正在建立,纳入的患者数量也在增加,因此必须了解并处理登记数据解读中潜在的陷阱。这篇特邀评论旨在讨论其中的一些话题。目的是介绍并讨论基于登记系统的研究的主要缺点以及如何处理这些问题,以促成更具效度的结果并最终改善手术疗效。

相似文献

1
Pitfalls in interpretation of large registry data on hernia repair.疝修补大型注册登记数据解读中的陷阱。
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):947-950. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1837-6. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
2
National results after ventral hernia repair.腹疝修补术后的全国性结果。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
3
[Hernia repair at the groin - who undergoes which surgical intervention?].[腹股沟疝修补术——哪些人接受哪种手术干预?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Aug;138(4):410-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350677. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
4
Impact of inadvertent enterotomy on short-term outcomes after ventral hernia repair: An AHSQC analysis.意外肠切开术对腹疝修补术后短期结局的影响:AHSQC 分析。
Surgery. 2018 Aug;164(2):327-332. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 May 27.
5
Extending the value of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program claims dataset to study long-term outcomes: Rate of repeat ventral hernia repair.扩展国家外科质量改进计划索赔数据集的价值以研究长期结局:复发性腹疝修补率
Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
6
Stapled Transabdominal Ostomy Reinforcement with retromuscular mesh (STORRM): Technical details and early outcomes of a novel approach for retromuscular repair of parastomal hernias.使用肌后补片的吻合器经腹造口加强术(STORRM):一种用于造口旁疝肌后修补的新方法的技术细节和早期结果
Am J Surg. 2018 Jan;215(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a novel intraperitoneal lightweight mesh coated with hyaluronic acid: 1-year follow-up from a case-control study using the Hernia-Club registry.使用一种新型的涂有透明质酸的腹腔内轻质补片进行腹腔镜腹疝修补术:来自一项使用疝气俱乐部登记处的病例对照研究的1年随访
Hernia. 2016 Oct;20(5):711-22. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1501-y. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
8
Carolinas Comfort Scale as a Measure of Hernia Repair Quality of Life: A Reappraisal Utilizing 3788 International Patients.卡罗莱纳舒适度量表作为衡量疝气修复生活质量的指标:对3788名国际患者的重新评估
Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):171-176. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002027.
9
When is mesh fixation in TAPP-repair of primary inguinal hernia repair necessary? The register-based analysis of 11,230 cases.在原发性腹股沟疝修补的TAPP手术中,何时进行补片固定是必要的?基于11230例病例的登记分析。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4363-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4754-8. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument.一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究,依据欧洲腹壁疝生活质量登记工具,对采用ProGrip腹腔镜自固定补片行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的生活质量进行研究。
Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1344-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Major complications and mortality after ventral hernia repair: an eleven-year Swedish nationwide cohort study.腹外疝修补术后的主要并发症和死亡率:一项十一年的瑞典全国队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01873-9.
2
Association of Mesh and Fixation Options with Reoperation Risk after Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Surgery: A Swedish Hernia Registry Study of 25,190 Totally Extraperitoneal and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repairs.瑞典疝登记研究:全腹膜外和经腹腹膜前修补术 25190 例腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术后网片和固定方式与再次手术风险的关系。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Mar 1;234(3):311-325. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000060.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project.疝登记系统的比较:CORE项目
Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):561-575. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1724-6. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
2
Time-to-event methodology improved statistical evaluation in register-based health services research.时间事件方法学提高了基于注册的健康服务研究中的统计评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
3
The Danish Ventral Hernia Database - a valuable tool for quality assessment and research.丹麦腹疝数据库——质量评估与研究的宝贵工具。
Early outcomes of component separation techniques: an analysis of the Spanish registry of incisional Hernia (EVEREG).
组件分离技术的早期结果:西班牙切口疝登记处(EVEREG)的分析。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1573-1580. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02449-x. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Building a national hernia registry in South Africa: initial ventral hernia repair results from a diverse healthcare sector.在南非建立全国疝气登记处:来自多元化医疗保健部门的初次腹疝修补结果
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):781-787. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02306-3. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
Mesh erosion into urinary bladder, rare condition but important to know.网片侵蚀进入膀胱,罕见情况,但需要了解。
Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):709-716. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01966-0. Epub 2019 May 9.
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:719-723. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99501. eCollection 2016.
4
Ethical aspects of registry-based research in the Nordic countries.北欧国家基于注册库的研究的伦理问题。
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 23;7:491-508. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S90589. eCollection 2015.
5
Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care.临床注册与医疗保险索赔数据在外科手术护理质量分类方面的比较。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):290-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000707.
6
When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology.当整个人群都是样本时:基于登记的流行病学的优势和局限性。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;29(8):551-8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9873-0. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
7
P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.P曲线:文件抽屉问题的关键。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):534-47. doi: 10.1037/a0033242. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
8
Internet trials: participant experiences and perspectives.网络试验:参与者的体验和看法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Oct 23;12:162. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-162.
9
EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair.EuraHS:一个国际腹部前壁疝修复注册和结果测量在线平台的发展。
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):239-50. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0912-7. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
10
Mesh hernia repair and male infertility: a retrospective register study.网片修补术与男性不育:一项回顾性登记研究。
Surgery. 2012 Jan;151(1):94-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.028. Epub 2011 Sep 22.