The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Nov;61:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
Uptake of hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing remains inadequate globally. Simplified point-of-care tests should enhance HCV diagnosis and elimination. We aimed to assess the acceptability of finger-stick and venepuncture HCV RNA testing among people who inject drugs (PWID).
Participants were enrolled in an observational cohort study with recruitment at 13 sites between June 2016 and February 2018. Capillary whole-blood collected by finger-stick and plasma collected by venepuncture were performed for Xpert HCV viral load testing. Participants completed a questionnaire on acceptability of, and preferences for, blood collection methods.
Among 565 participants (mean age, 44 years; 69% male), 64% reported injecting drugs in the last month, and 63% were receiving opioid substitution treatment. Eighty three percent reported that finger-stick testing was very acceptable. Overall, 65% of participants preferred finger-stick over venepuncture testing, with 61% of these preferring to receive results in 60 min. The most common reason for preferring finger-stick over venepuncture testing was it was quick (62%) followed by venous access difficulties (21%). The main reasons for preferring venepuncture over finger-stick testing were that it was quick (61%) and accurate (29%). Females were more likely to prefer finger-stick testing than males (adjusted OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.30, 2.99; p = 0.002). Among people with recent (previous month) injecting drug use, Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people were less likely than non-Aboriginal people to prefer finger-stick testing (adjusted OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.34, 0.9; p = 0.033).
Finger-stick whole-blood collection is acceptable to people who inject drugs, with males and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people with recent injecting drug use less likely to prefer finger-stick testing. Further research is needed to evaluate interventions integrating simplified point-of-care HCV testing to engage people in care in a single-visit, thereby facilitating HCV treatment scale-up.
全球范围内,人们对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)检测的接受程度仍然不足。简化的即时检测应有助于 HCV 的诊断和消除。本研究旨在评估在注射吸毒者(PWID)中使用指尖采血和静脉采血进行 HCV RNA 检测的可接受性。
参与者纳入了一项观察性队列研究,于 2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 2 月在 13 个地点进行招募。使用指尖采血收集毛细血管全血和静脉采血收集血浆,进行 Xpert HCV 病毒载量检测。参与者完成了一份关于采血方法可接受性和偏好的问卷。
在 565 名参与者(平均年龄 44 岁;69%为男性)中,64%的人报告在过去一个月内注射过毒品,63%的人正在接受阿片类药物替代治疗。83%的人报告说,指尖采血检测非常可接受。总体而言,65%的参与者更喜欢指尖采血检测而非静脉采血检测,其中 61%的人希望在 60 分钟内获得检测结果。选择指尖采血检测而非静脉采血检测的最常见原因是其快速(62%),其次是静脉通路困难(21%)。选择静脉采血检测而非指尖采血检测的主要原因是其快速(61%)和准确(29%)。女性比男性更倾向于选择指尖采血检测(调整后的 OR 1.96;95%CI 1.30,2.99;p=0.002)。在最近(上个月)有注射吸毒史的人群中,原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民比非原住民更不可能选择指尖采血检测(调整后的 OR 0.57;95%CI 0.34,0.9;p=0.033)。
指尖采血全血采集在注射吸毒者中是可以接受的,男性和最近有注射吸毒史的原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民不太可能选择指尖采血检测。需要进一步研究评估整合简化即时检测的干预措施,以便在单次就诊中让更多人参与护理,从而促进 HCV 治疗的扩大。