Pot Hanneke, de Kok Bregje C, Finyiza Gertrude
a PhD candidate, Centre for Development and the Environment (SUM) , University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.
b Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
Reprod Health Matters. 2018 Nov;26(54):126-136. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1535688. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
Despite the strong global focus on improving maternal health during past decades, there is still a long way to go to ensure equitable access to services and quality of care for women and girls around the world. To understand widely acknowledged inequities and policy-to-practice gaps in maternal health, we must critically analyse the workings of power in policy and health systems. This paper analyses power dynamics at play in the implementation of maternal health policies in rural Malawi, a country with one of the world's highest burdens of maternal mortality. Specifically, we analyse Malawi's recent experience with the temporary reintroduction of user-fees for maternity services as a response to the suspension of donor funding, a shift in political leadership and priorities, and unstable service contracts between the government and its implementing partner, the Christian Health Association of Malawi. Based on ethnographic research conducted in 2015/16, the article describes the perceptions and experiences of policy implementation among various local actors (health workers, village heads and women). The way in which maternity services "fall apart" and are "fixed" is the result of dynamic interactions between policy and webs of accountability. Policies meet with a cascade of dynamic responses, which ultimately result in the exclusion of the most vulnerable rural women from maternity care services, against the aims of global and national safe motherhood policies.
尽管在过去几十年里全球都高度重视改善孕产妇健康,但要确保世界各地妇女和女孩公平获得服务及护理质量,仍有很长的路要走。为了理解孕产妇健康领域广泛存在的不平等现象以及政策与实践之间的差距,我们必须批判性地分析政策和卫生系统中的权力运作。本文分析了在马拉维农村地区实施孕产妇健康政策过程中所起作用的权力动态,马拉维是全球孕产妇死亡率负担最高的国家之一。具体而言,我们分析了马拉维最近重新临时收取孕产妇服务费用的经历,这是对捐助资金暂停、政治领导层和优先事项转变以及政府与其执行伙伴马拉维基督教卫生协会之间不稳定的服务合同的回应。基于2015/16年进行的人种志研究,本文描述了不同地方行为体(卫生工作者、村长和妇女)对政策实施的看法和经历。孕产妇服务“瓦解”和“修复”的方式是政策与问责网络之间动态互动的结果。政策引发了一系列动态反应,最终导致最弱势的农村妇女被排除在孕产妇护理服务之外,这与全球和国家安全孕产政策的目标背道而驰。