Suppr超能文献

农村医疗卫生实践、研究与教育中消费者参与情况的混合方法系统评价。

Mixed methods systematic review of consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education.

作者信息

Broadhurst Talisker, Cha Yu Jin, Bartlett Caitlin, Van Heerden Johanna, Smith Lauren, Lizarondo Lucylynn, McGrail Matthew, Nasir Bushra, Hulme Adam, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan Srinivas, Martin Priya

机构信息

Rockhampton Base Hospital, Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, 2 Canning Street, Rockhampton City, Queensland 4700, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 20 Weightman Street, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf140.

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education. It was conducted using the JBI mixed methods methodology, specifically the convergent integrated approach. PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched, along with gray literature sources-Google, ProQuest Dissertation, and Theses Global. Primary research studies published globally in English, from 2011 to 2024 were included. Dual reviewer screening occurred in two stages, title and abstract, then followed by full text. Critical appraisals of included studies were undertaken using McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool for quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Extracted data was synthesized to develop themes for reporting per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. This review identified 25 studies that explored the top three levels of consumer involvement in rural healthcare settings, namely Partnership, Involving, and Consumer-led, adapted from the 2011 National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control. Five key themes were developed from the data: positive impacts of co-design, importance of relationship building, sustainability of interventions, power issues in co-design, and the importance of context. Findings showed that interventions utilizing the top three partnership levels (consumer-led, partnership, and involving) consistently lead to positive impacts on health outcomes of rural communities with higher levels of sustained engagement. Enablers and barriers were identified and categorized into a macro, micro, and meso framework for direct comparison between studies. Rural healthcare initiatives involving consumer engagement appear to have several benefits including strengthening community-researcher relationships, enhanced sustainability, and enriching local contexts while addressing power imbalances to enhance healthcare outcomes.

摘要

本系统评价旨在综合关于消费者参与农村卫生实践、研究和教育的证据。它采用了循证卫生保健国际协作组织(JBI)的混合方法,特别是收敛性综合方法。检索了PubMed、PsychINFO、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、科学网、EMBASE和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL),以及灰色文献来源——谷歌、ProQuest学位论文和全球学位论文数据库。纳入了2011年至2024年在全球以英文发表的原发性研究。双审稿人筛选分两个阶段进行,先是标题和摘要,然后是全文。分别使用麦克马斯特定量和定性研究批判性评价工具以及混合方法评价工具对纳入研究进行批判性评价。提取的数据进行综合,以按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南制定报告主题。本评价确定了25项研究,这些研究探讨了消费者在农村医疗环境中参与的前三个层次,即伙伴关系、参与和消费者主导,改编自2011年《消费者参与癌症控制国家框架》。从数据中得出了五个关键主题:共同设计的积极影响、建立关系的重要性、干预措施的可持续性、共同设计中的权力问题以及背景的重要性。研究结果表明,利用前三个伙伴关系层次(消费者主导、伙伴关系和参与)的干预措施始终会对农村社区的健康结果产生积极影响,且参与度持续较高。确定了促进因素和障碍,并将其分类为宏观、微观和中观框架,以便在研究之间进行直接比较。涉及消费者参与的农村医疗保健举措似乎有诸多益处,包括加强社区与研究人员的关系、提高可持续性、丰富当地环境,同时解决权力不平衡问题以改善医疗保健结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验