Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
J Endod. 2018 Dec;44(12):1862-1866. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of small-volume cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to detect and measure isthmi in the apical root canals of mandibular molars by using micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) as the reference standard.
Forty mandibular first molars selected on the basis of μ-CT scan and presenting isthmi in the apical 3-mm mesial roots were scanned by using the highest-resolution settings of a small-volume CBCT unit. Isthmi lengths were measured and compared between both μ-CT and CBCT images to study the accuracy of CBCT readings. Quantitative data for sensitivity rate were depicted as percentage value with 95% confidence interval. Results were analyzed by using linear regression between true lengths (μ-CT) and CBCT lengths, Bland-Altman plot and t test, at α = 0.05.
CBCT sensitivity for isthmi detection was 65% (95% confidence interval, 0.4667-0.8333). An average of 74.7% of the lengths could be measured, and differences among the lengths in μ-CT and CBCT were significant (P < .05; mean, 0.756 ± 0.655; t test), showing that there was no agreement between both methods.
Accuracy of identifying apical isthmi of mandibular molars was highly influenced by the evaluation method. Small-volume CBCT imaging could not detect and measure apical isthmi length accurately. Moreover, using high-resolution settings in CBCT, it was not reliable to forecast the actual apical root canal anatomy.
本研究的目的是评估小容积锥形束 CT(CBCT)检测和测量下颌磨牙近中根根尖 3mm 处峡部的准确性,以微计算机断层扫描(μ-CT)作为参考标准。
根据 μ-CT 扫描选择 40 颗下颌第一磨牙,其近中根根尖 3mm 处存在峡部。使用小容积 CBCT 单元的最高分辨率设置对其进行扫描。测量并比较 μ-CT 和 CBCT 图像上的峡部长度,以研究 CBCT 读数的准确性。灵敏度率的定量数据以百分比值表示,置信区间为 95%。结果通过 μ-CT 真实长度和 CBCT 长度之间的线性回归、Bland-Altman 图和 t 检验进行分析,α值为 0.05。
CBCT 检测峡部的灵敏度为 65%(95%置信区间,0.4667-0.8333)。平均有 74.7%的长度可以测量,μ-CT 和 CBCT 之间的长度差异具有统计学意义(P<.05;平均值,0.756±0.655;t 检验),表明两种方法之间没有一致性。
评估方法极大地影响了识别下颌磨牙根尖峡部的准确性。小容积 CBCT 成像不能准确检测和测量根尖峡部的长度。此外,在 CBCT 中使用高分辨率设置,无法可靠地预测实际的根尖根管解剖结构。