Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Tinsley Building, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK.
Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière (ICM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
Trends Neurosci. 2019 Feb;42(2):79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
The trade-off between reward and effort is at the heart of most behavioral theories, from ecology to economics. Compared to reward, however, effort remains poorly understood, both at the behavioral and neurophysiological levels. This is important because unwillingness to overcome effort to gain reward is a common feature of many neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. A recent surge in interest in the neurobiological basis of effort has led to seemingly conflicting results regarding the role of dopamine. We argue here that, upon closer examination, there is actually striking consensus across studies: dopamine primarily codes for future reward but is less sensitive to anticipated effort cost. This strong association between dopamine and the incentive effects of rewards places dopamine in a key position to promote reward-directed action.
在从生态学到经济学的大多数行为理论中,奖励与努力之间的权衡都是核心问题。然而,与奖励相比,努力在行为和神经生理学层面上的理解都还很不完善。这一点很重要,因为不愿意付出努力去获得奖励是许多神经精神和神经退行性疾病的一个共同特征。最近,人们对努力的神经生物学基础产生了浓厚的兴趣,这导致了关于多巴胺作用的似乎相互矛盾的结果。在这里,我们认为,经过更仔细的研究,实际上在各个研究之间存在着惊人的共识:多巴胺主要编码未来的奖励,但对预期的努力成本不太敏感。多巴胺与奖励的激励作用之间的这种强烈关联使多巴胺处于促进奖励导向行为的关键位置。