Suppr超能文献

使用 LC-MS/MS 对配对采集的口服液和尿液进行分析,比较接受丁丙诺啡治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者的药物阳性率。

Positivity rates of drugs in patients treated for opioid dependence with buprenorphine: A comparison of oral fluid and urine using paired collections and LC-MS/MS.

机构信息

Millennium Health, LLC, 15330 Avenue of Science, San Diego, CA 92128, USA.

Millennium Health, LLC, 15330 Avenue of Science, San Diego, CA 92128, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Sep 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug testing is recommended as part of comprehensive monitoring for medication-assisted treatment. Alternative matrices including oral fluid offer a number of advantages when compared with conventional urine testing but are not as well characterized. This study aims to compare positivity rates of drugs and drug classes in oral fluid and urine as a measure of the clinical utility of oral fluid in the evaluation and treatment of patients with opioid use disorders.

METHODS

A retrospective review of paired oral fluid and urine test results from Millennium Health's laboratory database was performed for 2746 patients with reported prescriptions for buprenorphine products used in the treatment of opioid dependence. Specimens were tested using quantitative LC-MS/MS for 34 medications, metabolites and illicit drugs.

RESULTS

A number of medications and illicit drugs were detected at comparable or higher rates in oral fluid vs. urine such as cocaine (15.7% vs. 7.9%), opiates (13.4% vs. 10.0%), oxycodone (8.6% vs. 3.7%), hydrocodone (3.0% vs. 1.2%) and others. Lower detection rates were observed in oral fluid vs. urine for benzodiazepines (6.6% vs. 8.7%), cannabinoids (15.5% vs. 19.5%), oxymorphone (1.8% vs. 3.1%) and hydromorphone (0.8% vs. 4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians may find oral fluid advantageous for detection of specific drugs and medications in certain clinical situations. Understanding the relative differences between urine and oral fluid can help clinicians carefully select tests best suited for detection in their respective matrix. To our knowledge, this is the largest inter-matrix patient comparison study using paired collections and direct to definitive testing.

摘要

背景

药物检测被推荐作为药物辅助治疗综合监测的一部分。与传统的尿液检测相比,包括唾液在内的替代基质具有许多优势,但尚未得到充分描述。本研究旨在比较唾液和尿液中药物和药物类别的阳性率,以评估唾液在评估和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍患者中的临床应用。

方法

对 Millennium Health 实验室数据库中 2746 例报告有阿片类药物使用障碍患者使用的丁丙诺啡产品处方的唾液和尿液检测结果进行回顾性分析。使用定量 LC-MS/MS 对 34 种药物、代谢物和非法药物进行检测。

结果

与尿液相比,唾液中检测到许多药物和非法药物的阳性率相当或更高,如可卡因(15.7% vs. 7.9%)、阿片类药物(13.4% vs. 10.0%)、羟考酮(8.6% vs. 3.7%)、氢可酮(3.0% vs. 1.2%)等。而唾液中检测到的苯二氮䓬类药物(6.6% vs. 8.7%)、大麻素(15.5% vs. 19.5%)、羟吗啡酮(1.8% vs. 3.1%)和氢吗啡酮(0.8% vs. 4.5%)的阳性率较低。

结论

临床医生可能会发现唾液在某些临床情况下检测特定药物和药物更具优势。了解尿液和唾液之间的相对差异可以帮助临床医生根据各自的基质选择最适合检测的检测方法。据我们所知,这是使用配对采集和直接确证检测进行的最大的基质间患者比较研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验