• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性疼痛患者的口腔液药物检测。二、配对的口腔液和尿液样本的比较。

Oral fluid drug testing of chronic pain patients. II. Comparison of paired oral fluid and urine specimens.

机构信息

Aegis Sciences Corporation, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 2012 Mar;36(2):75-80. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkr019.

DOI:10.1093/jat/bkr019
PMID:22337775
Abstract

A clinical study was conducted to compare the use of oral fluid to urine for compliance monitoring of pain patients. Patients (n = 133) undergoing treatment for chronic pain at four clinics participated in the study and provided paired oral fluid and urine specimens. Oral fluid specimens were collected with Quantisal(TM) saliva collection devices immediately following urine collection. Oral fluid specimens were analyzed for 42 drugs and/or metabolites by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry procedures. Accompanying urine specimens were initially screened by immunoassay and non-negative results were confirmed. Of the 1544 paired tests, 329 (21.3%) drug analytes were positive, and 984 (63.7%) were negative for both specimens resulting in an overall agreement of 85%. There were 83 (5.4%) analyte results that were positive in oral fluid and negative in urine, and 148 (9.6%) were negative in oral fluid and positive in urine for an overall disagreement of 15%. Cohen's Kappa value was 0.64, indicating "substantial" agreement. The primary exceptions to agreement were the lower detection rates for hydromorphone, oxymorphone, and benzodiazepines in oral fluid compared to urine. The authors conclude that, overall, oral fluid tests produced comparable results to urine tests with some minor differences in detection rates for different drug classes.

摘要

一项临床研究比较了使用唾液和尿液来监测疼痛患者的用药依从性。来自四家诊所的 133 名慢性疼痛患者参与了该研究,提供了配对的唾液和尿液样本。在收集尿液后,立即使用 Quantisal(TM)唾液采集装置采集唾液样本。通过验证的液相色谱-串联质谱程序分析了唾液样本中的 42 种药物和/或代谢物。尿液样本最初通过免疫测定进行筛选,非阴性结果得到确认。在 1544 对检测中,329 种(21.3%)药物分析物在唾液中呈阳性,984 种(63.7%)在两种样本中均呈阴性,总一致性为 85%。有 83 种(5.4%)分析物在唾液中呈阳性而在尿液中呈阴性,148 种(9.6%)在唾液中呈阴性而在尿液中呈阳性,总不一致率为 15%。Cohen's Kappa 值为 0.64,表明存在“实质性”一致性。一致性的主要例外是与尿液相比,唾液中氢吗啡酮、羟吗啡酮和苯二氮䓬类药物的检测率较低。作者得出结论,总体而言,唾液检测与尿液检测结果相当,但不同药物类别的检测率存在一些差异。

相似文献

1
Oral fluid drug testing of chronic pain patients. II. Comparison of paired oral fluid and urine specimens.慢性疼痛患者的口腔液药物检测。二、配对的口腔液和尿液样本的比较。
J Anal Toxicol. 2012 Mar;36(2):75-80. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkr019.
2
Oral fluid drug testing of chronic pain patients. I. Positive prevalence rates of licit and illicit drugs.慢性疼痛患者的口腔液药物检测。一、合法和非法药物的阳性检出率。
J Anal Toxicol. 2011 Oct;35(8):529-40. doi: 10.1093/anatox/35.8.529.
3
Utility of oral fluid in compliance monitoring of opioid medications.口腔液在阿片类药物依从性监测中的效用。
Pain Physician. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):63-70.
4
Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of immunoassay with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) of urine drug testing (UDT) opioids and illicit drugs in chronic pain patients.比较免疫分析法与液相色谱串联质谱法(LC/MS/MS)尿液药物检测(UDT)在慢性疼痛患者中检测阿片类药物和非法药物的准确性。
Pain Physician. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):175-87.
5
Interpretation of oxycodone concentrations in oral fluid.口腔液中羟考酮浓度的解读。
J Opioid Manag. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):161-6. doi: 10.5055/jom.2012.0112.
6
Positivity rates of drugs in patients treated for opioid dependence with buprenorphine: A comparison of oral fluid and urine using paired collections and LC-MS/MS.使用 LC-MS/MS 对配对采集的口服液和尿液进行分析,比较接受丁丙诺啡治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者的药物阳性率。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
7
A critical assessment of opioid treatment adherence using urine drug testing in chronic pain management.利用尿液药物检测评估慢性疼痛管理中阿片类药物治疗的依从性。
Postgrad Med. 2011 Nov;123(6):124-31. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.11.2502.
8
Protocol for accuracy of point of care (POC) or in-office urine drug testing (immunoassay) in chronic pain patients: a prospective analysis of immunoassay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectometry (LC/MS/MS).慢性疼痛患者即时检测(POC)或门诊尿液药物检测(免疫测定)准确性的方案:免疫测定和液相色谱串联质谱法(LC/MS/MS)的前瞻性分析。
Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E1-E22.
9
Drugs of abuse in oral fluid collected by two different sample kits--stability testing and validation using ultra performance tandem mass spectrometry analysis.两种不同取样试剂盒采集的唾液中滥用药物的稳定性测试和超高效串联质谱分析验证。
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011 Nov 15;879(30):3367-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
10
Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of benzodiazepine testing in chronic pain patients utilizing immunoassay with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) of urine drug testing.利用尿液药物检测的免疫分析法与液相色谱串联质谱法(LC/MS/MS)对慢性疼痛患者进行苯二氮䓬类药物检测的准确性进行比较评估。
Pain Physician. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):259-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Detection of Cannabinoids in Oral Fluid Specimens as the Preferred Biological Matrix for a Point-of-Care Biosensor Diagnostic Device.在口腔液样本中检测大麻素作为即时检测生物传感器诊断设备的首选生物基质。
Biosensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 27;14(3):126. doi: 10.3390/bios14030126.
2
Direct-To-Definitive Urine and Oral Fluid Test Results for Unscreened and Rarely Screened Drugs in Individuals Applying for Methadone Treatment in 7 U.S. States.美国7个州申请美沙酮治疗的未筛查和极少筛查药物的即时尿液和口腔液检测结果
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2024 Feb 8:1-12. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2024.2314220.
3
Comparing presumptive with direct-to-definitive drug testing in oral fluid vs. urine for a U.S. national sample of individuals misusing drugs.
将疑似药物滥用者的口腔液与尿液进行直接确证药物检测的比较:来自美国全国药物滥用者样本的研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Sep 1;250:110894. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110894. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
4
High-throughput quantitative binding analysis of DNA aptamers using exonucleases.高通量定量结合分析 DNA 适体的外切核酸酶。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Feb 28;51(4):e19. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1210.
5
A Human Oral Fluid Assay for - and Isomer Detection of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine Using Liquid-Liquid Extraction.一种采用液-液萃取法检测苯丙胺和甲基苯丙胺及其异构体的人体口腔液检测方法。
J Anal Methods Chem. 2022 Dec 2;2022:4819599. doi: 10.1155/2022/4819599. eCollection 2022.
6
Urine Drug Testing in Cancer Pain Management.癌症疼痛管理中的尿液药物检测。
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):99-104. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0525. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Oral Fluid vs. Urine Analysis to Monitor Synthetic Cannabinoids and Classic Drugs Recent Exposure.口腔液与尿液分析用于监测合成大麻素和经典药物近期暴露情况。
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2017;18(10):796-805. doi: 10.2174/1389201018666171122113934.
8
A Novel Oral Fluid Assay (LC-QTOF-MS) for the Detection of Fentanyl and Clandestine Opioids in Oral Fluid After Reported Heroin Overdose.一种新型口腔液检测方法(液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱法)用于检测报告海洛因过量后口腔液中的芬太尼和非法阿片类药物。
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Dec;13(4):287-292. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0632-6. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
9
Comparison of Urine and Oral Fluid for Workplace Drug Testing.工作场所药物检测中尿液与口腔液的比较。
J Anal Toxicol. 2016 Sep;40(7):479-85. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkw055. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
10
Counselors' Clinical Use of Definitive Drug Testing Results in Their Work with Substance-Use Clients: a Qualitative Study.咨询师在与药物使用客户合作中对确定性药物检测结果的临床应用:一项定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2016;14:64-80. doi: 10.1007/s11469-015-9569-7. Epub 2015 Jul 21.