• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置患者胃肠道出血再入院的结局与预测因素

Outcomes and Predictors of Readmissions with GI Bleeding in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

作者信息

Shah Rushikesh, Qayed Emad

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

South Med J. 2018 Nov;111(11):666-673. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000883.

DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000883
PMID:30392001
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a major comorbidity in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The study aim was to estimate the rate of hospital readmissions for GI bleeding in patients with LVADs using a nationally representative database. Additionally, we evaluated the etiologies, costs, endoscopy utilization, mortality, and predictors of GI bleeding readmissions in these patients.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2010 through 2014. We compared hospitalized adult patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) who underwent LVAD implantation (cases) with CHF patients without LVAD or heart transplant (controls). Three age- and sex-matched controls were randomly selected per single case. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to compare the hazards of 60-day all-cause and GI bleeding readmission between the groups, controlling for significant confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 3293 hospitalized patients with CHF who had LVAD placement (cases) and 9879 who did not have LVADs (controls) were included in the study. At 60 days, patients with LVAD had a significantly higher readmission rate with GI bleeding (8.7% vs 2.3%, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.45, 95% confidence interval 3.71-5.33, < 0.0001). The all-cause readmission rate also was higher (43.3% vs 35.7%, aHR 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.34, < 0.0001). The most common etiologies of bleeding in patients with LVADs were gastroduodenal and small intestinal arteriovenous malformations (28.6%). During bleeding readmissions, patients with LVAD were more likely to undergo endoscopy (72.1% vs 33.5%, < 0.0001) and receive packed red blood cell transfusions (62% vs 36.6%, < 0.0001) compared with controls. GI bleeding readmissions were more costly ($40,936 vs $35,313, < 0.0001), and longer (12 vs 10.9 days, < 0.0001) in patients with LVADs compared with controls. Independent risk factors for 60-day GI bleeding readmission were increasing age (aHR 1.04, < 0.0001) and GI bleeding during index admission (aHR 2.68, < 0.0001). In those without bleeding during index admission, increasing age and chronic anemia were associated with 60-day GI bleeding readmission. Mortality during bleeding readmission was similarly low in patients with LVADs compared with CHF controls (0.2% vs 0.3%, = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

After LVAD implantation, there is a fivefold increased risk of readmission with GI bleeding within 60 days. Gastroduodenal and small intestinal arteriovenous malformations are the most common culprit lesions. These findings suggest that small bowel enteroscopy should be considered as the initial test of choice in patients with suspected upper gastroduodenal bleeding. Readmissions with bleeding in patients with LVADs increase morbidity and cost of care but not mortality. Older patients and those with a history of bleeding during LVAD implantation are at higher risk of bleeding readmission and may benefit from close monitoring and cautious anticoagulation to prevent rebleeding.

摘要

目的

胃肠道(GI)出血是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的主要合并症。本研究旨在利用全国代表性数据库估计LVAD患者因GI出血再次入院的发生率。此外,我们评估了这些患者GI出血再次入院的病因、费用、内镜检查的使用情况、死亡率及预测因素。

方法

我们分析了2010年至2014年国家再入院数据库(NRD)中的数据。我们将接受LVAD植入术的充血性心力衰竭(CHF)住院成年患者(病例组)与未接受LVAD或心脏移植的CHF患者(对照组)进行比较。每个病例随机选取3名年龄和性别匹配的对照。采用多变量Cox回归模型比较两组60天全因再入院和GI出血再入院的风险,并对显著的混杂因素进行控制。

结果

本研究共纳入3293例接受LVAD植入术的CHF住院患者(病例组)和9879例未接受LVAD植入术的患者(对照组)。60天时,LVAD患者因GI出血再次入院的发生率显著更高(8.7%对2.3%,调整后风险比[aHR]4.45,95%置信区间3.7⒈5.33,P<0.0001)。全因再入院率也更高(43.3%对35.7%,aHR⒈23,95%置信区间⒈12⒈34,P<0.0001)。LVAD患者出血的最常见病因是胃十二指肠和小肠动静脉畸形(28.6%)。与对照组相比,LVAD患者在出血再次入院期间更有可能接受内镜检查(72.1%对33.5%,P<0.0001)和接受浓缩红细胞输注(62%对36.6%,P<0.0001)。与对照组相比,LVAD患者因GI出血再次入院的费用更高(40936美元对35313美元,P<0.0001),住院时间更长(12天对10.9天,P<0.0001)。60天GI出血再入院的独立危险因素是年龄增加(aHR⒈04,P<0.0001)和首次入院期间发生GI出血(aHR⒈68,P<0.0001)。在首次入院期间未发生出血的患者中,年龄增加和慢性贫血与60天GI出血再入院有关。与CHF对照组相比,LVAD患者出血再次入院期间的死亡率同样较低(0.2%对0.3%,P⒈4)。

结论

LVAD植入术后,60天内因GI出血再次入院的风险增加了五倍。胃十二指肠和小肠动静脉畸形是最常见的病因。这些发现表明,对于疑似上胃十二指肠出血的患者,小肠镜检查应被视为首选的初始检查。LVAD患者出血再次入院会增加发病率和护理费用,但不会增加死亡率。老年患者和LVAD植入期间有出血史的患者出血再次入院的风险更高,可能受益于密切监测和谨慎抗凝以预防再次出血。

相似文献

1
Outcomes and Predictors of Readmissions with GI Bleeding in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者胃肠道出血再入院的结局与预测因素
South Med J. 2018 Nov;111(11):666-673. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000883.
2
Factors determining post-operative readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后再入院的决定因素
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Oct;33(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
3
Association of Nasal Mucosal Vascular Alterations, Gastrointestinal Arteriovenous Malformations, and Bleeding in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者鼻腔黏膜血管改变、胃肠道动静脉畸形和出血的相关性。
JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Dec;4(12):962-970. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
4
Timing of Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices Associates With Anatomic Location, Presentation, and Management.左心室辅助装置植入后胃肠道出血的时间与解剖位置、表现和治疗相关。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;17(3):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.056. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
5
Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study.左心室辅助装置植入术后的当代医院再入院情况:一项大型单中心研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct 1;42(5):419-29. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4971. eCollection 2015 Oct.
6
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.左心室辅助装置接受者胃肠道出血的危险因素及结局
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;117(2):240-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.041. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Left Ventricular Assist Devices Impact Hospital Resource Utilization Without Affecting Patient Mortality in Gastrointestinal Bleeding.左心室辅助装置对胃肠道出血患者的医院资源利用有影响,但不影响患者死亡率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):150-160. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4379-8. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
8
Trends and outcomes of device-related 30-day readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后与器械相关的 30 天再入院率的趋势和结果。
Eur J Intern Med. 2021 Feb;84:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Hospital Complications and Causes of 90-Day Readmissions After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置植入术后的医院并发症及90天再入院原因
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;122(3):420-430. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 May 1.
10
Thirty-Day Readmissions After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in the United States: Insights From the Nationwide Readmissions Database.美国左心室辅助装置植入术后 30 天再入院情况:来自全国再入院数据库的分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Mar;11(3):e004628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004628.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on the Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes in Advanced Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.左心室辅助装置对晚期心力衰竭患者生活质量和功能结局的影响:一项综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 22;17(7):e88527. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88527. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Heart Transplantation and Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Long-Term Prognosis and Effects on Mental Health.心脏移植与左心室辅助装置:长期预后及对心理健康的影响
Cureus. 2024 Sep 5;16(9):e68691. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68691. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Impact of left ventricular assist devices on 30-day readmission and outcomes in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide analysis.
左心室辅助装置对非静脉曲张性上消化道出血30天再入院率及预后的影响:一项全国性分析
Prz Gastroenterol. 2024;19(2):175-185. doi: 10.5114/pg.2023.134394. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Pre-left ventricular assist device endoscopic evaluation does not reduce the risk of later gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study.左心室辅助装置置入前的内镜评估并不能降低后期胃肠道出血的风险:一项多中心研究。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 May-Jun;37(3):313-320. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0878. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
5
Current status and future directions in pediatric ventricular assist device.儿科心室辅助装置的现状和未来方向。
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Jul;29(4):769-784. doi: 10.1007/s10741-024-10396-9. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
6
Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Complications Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement: An Emphasis on Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Stroke, and Pump Thrombosis.左心室辅助装置植入后的血栓形成和出血并发症:重点关注胃肠道出血、中风和泵血栓形成。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):e51160. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51160. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Long-term assist device patients admitted to ICU: Tips and pitfalls.入住重症监护病房的长期辅助装置患者:提示与陷阱
J Intensive Med. 2022 Dec 15;3(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.10.004. eCollection 2023 Apr 30.
8
Risk factors of readmission to acute care hospital among individuals with heart failure and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) at inpatient rehabilitation setting (STROBE compliant article).心力衰竭和左心室辅助装置 (LVAD) 患者在住院康复环境中再次入院的风险因素 (符合 STROBE 标准的文章)。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23618. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023618.
9
Treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding in left ventricular assist devices: A comprehensive review.左心室辅助装置相关胃肠道出血的治疗:全面综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 May 28;26(20):2550-2558. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2550.