[Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) versus density gradient centrifugation (DGC) for the selection of human sperm in assisted reproductive techniques].

To investigate whether the assisted reproductive techniques (ART) outcomes can be improved by using magnetic-activated cell sorting combined isolate density gradient centrifugation (MACS-DGC), and to compare the results with the conventional isolate density gradient centrifugation (DGC) method. In the period from January to December 2014, patients who attended the andrology laboratory for sperm DNA fragmentation analysis and underwent the fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment were divided into 3 groups, and each group has two subgroups according to the way of fertilization : in vitro fertilization (IVF) as subgroup 1 and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as subgroup 2. Group A (A1, A2 ): DNA fragmentation index(DFI)≥20 and using MACs; Group B (B1, B2): DFI≥20 and using isolate method; Group C (C1, C2): DFI<20 and using isolate method. The fertilization rate, good-quality embryos, implantation rate, pregnancy rate and live-birth rate of each group were analyzed. Similar results were obtained among groups for all the parameters compared: On IVF cycles no significant difference was observed in fertilization rate, percentage of good-quality embryos on day 3, implantation rate, positive beta-hCG tests, and live-birth rate among the three subgroups (A1 vs B1 vs C1). Between the subgroups of ICSI cycles (A2 vs B2 vs C2) the percentage of high-quality embryos, pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live-birth rate were all significantly higher in the MACS-DGC (A2) group compared to DGC alone (B2). Based on the results, MACS as a part of sperm preparation technique will not improve sperm fertilizing potential, embryos quality, implantation rate, pregnancy rate or live-birth rate of IVF, but it may help select the most fertile sperm and to improve clinical outcomes of ICSI.