MIND Institute, University of California, Davis.
MIND Institute, University of California, Davis.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;57(11):849-857.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
The diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been found to be remarkably stable but few studies have followed children not initially diagnosed with ASD beyond 3 years of age to examine late or delayed diagnoses. The present study used a prospective familial-risk design to identify children who had undergone multiple comprehensive assessments in preschool and were determined to be negative for ASD only to meet criteria for ASD when tested in middle childhood.
Data were pooled across 3 research teams studying later-born siblings of children with ASD. Fourteen children met inclusion criteria for the late-diagnosed group and were compared with a large sample of high- and low-risk siblings from the same sites who had ASD or typical development (TD) outcomes at 3 years of age.
As a group, the late-diagnosed children scored between the TD and ASD groups on most measures administered at 3 years and differed significantly from the ASD group on most measures. However, there was significant heterogeneity among the late-diagnosed cases. Seven showed very little evidence of ASD in preschool, whereas 7 demonstrated subtle, subthreshold symptomatology.
Some children with ASD might present with a subtle phenotype early in life or show a prolonged time course of symptom development. This emphasizes the need for screening and surveillance schedules that extend past 36 months and continued evaluation of any child who presents with atypical early development and/or high-risk status. The findings also shed light on reasons why the mean age of ASD diagnosis remains older than 4 years.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的诊断被发现非常稳定,但很少有研究对未被最初诊断为 ASD 的儿童进行随访,以检查其是否存在迟发性或延迟性诊断。本研究采用前瞻性家族风险设计,确定了在学龄前接受多次全面评估且仅在儿童中期测试时符合 ASD 标准的儿童,这些儿童被确定为 ASD 阴性。
数据来自 3 个研究小组,这些小组研究的是 ASD 儿童的晚生兄弟姐妹。14 名儿童符合迟发性诊断组的纳入标准,并与来自同一地点的具有 ASD 或典型发育(TD)结果的高风险和低风险兄弟姐妹的大样本进行比较,这些儿童在 3 岁时具有 ASD 或典型发育(TD)结果。
作为一个群体,迟发性诊断组的大多数儿童在 3 岁时的大多数评估中得分在 TD 和 ASD 组之间,并且在大多数评估中与 ASD 组显著不同。然而,迟发性诊断组的病例存在显著的异质性。其中 7 例在学龄前表现出很少的 ASD 证据,而 7 例表现出微妙的亚临床症状。
一些 ASD 儿童可能在生命早期表现出轻微的表型,或者表现出较长的症状发展过程。这强调了需要进行筛查和监测计划,这些计划应延长至 36 个月以上,并对任何表现出非典型早期发育和/或高风险状态的儿童进行持续评估。这些发现也揭示了为什么 ASD 的平均诊断年龄仍大于 4 岁的原因。