• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多观察者对比研究:在外周动脉疾病合并慢性肾功能不全患者中,应用非增强静息期单次激发磁共振血管成像与有创二氧化碳血管成像的对比。

Multi-observer comparison study between unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography and invasive carbon dioxide angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease and chronic renal insufficiency.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2018 Nov;108:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.029
PMID:30396647
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Non-contrast-enhanced quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS-MRA) and invasive carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography are suggested as nephroprotective methods for accurate staging of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI). The aim of our study was to compare the image quality of both examinations.

METHODS

16 consecutive PAD patients with highly impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73 m²) who underwent 3 T MRA with QISS and catheter angiography with CO2 within 90 days were retrospectively included. Subjective image quality was determined using a five-point Likert scale (1, non-diagnostic; 5, excellent) and presence of significant (≥50%) stenoses of pelvic and lower extremity arteries (21-segment-model) was evaluated per-region and per-segment, respectively, in random order by four independent readers with different levels of experience. CO2 angiography of an experienced interventional radiologist was considered the standard reference method.

RESULTS

167 segments were available for direct comparison with a prevalence of ≥50% stenoses of 28.1%. QISS-MRA yield was: sensitivity 91.5%, specificity 94.2%, positive predictive value 86.0% and negative predictive value 96.6%, with an intraclass correlation coeffcient (ICC) of 0.88. Median values of qualitative imaging parameters for QISS-MRA were as follows: arterial signal intensity: 4 (pelvis), 5 (thigh), 5 (calf); venous overlay: 4, 5, 5; susceptibility artifacts: 5, 5, 5; motion artifacts: 4, 5, 5; ECG-related artifacts: 5, 5, 5. ICC-values for image quality were 0.74, 0.73, 0.93, 0.69 and 0.79, respectively. Arterial opacification at CO2 angiography was rated 3, 4, 3, with an ICC of 0.63.

CONCLUSIONS

Image quality of non-invasive unenhanced MR angiography with QISS was preferred over invasive CO2 angiography, whilst taking into account that it offers high diagnostic performance for the detection and ruling out of PAD.

摘要

目的

非对比增强静息期单次激发磁共振血管成像(QISS-MRA)和有创二氧化碳(CO2)血管造影被认为是保护肾功能的方法,可用于准确分期慢性肾功能不全(CRI)患者的外周动脉疾病(PAD)。本研究旨在比较两种检查的图像质量。

方法

回顾性纳入 16 例连续的肾功能严重受损(估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<30ml/min/1.73m²)的 PAD 患者,他们在 90 天内行 3T MRA 检查采用 QISS 和 CO2 导管血管造影。使用五点李克特量表(1,无法诊断;5,优秀)对主观图像质量进行评估,并分别对盆腔和下肢动脉(21 节段模型)进行区域和节段评估,由 4 名具有不同经验水平的独立读者随机进行。有经验的介入放射科医生的 CO2 血管造影被认为是标准参考方法。

结果

167 个节段可与≥50%狭窄的患病率直接比较,为 28.1%。QISS-MRA 的检出率为:敏感性 91.5%,特异性 94.2%,阳性预测值 86.0%,阴性预测值 96.6%,内类相关系数(ICC)为 0.88。QISS-MRA 定性成像参数的中位数如下:动脉信号强度:4(骨盆)、5(大腿)、5(小腿);静脉覆盖:4、5、5;磁敏感伪影:5、5、5;运动伪影:4、5、5;心电图相关伪影:5、5、5。图像质量的 ICC 值分别为 0.74、0.73、0.93、0.69 和 0.79。CO2 血管造影的动脉显影评分为 3、4、3,ICC 值为 0.63。

结论

考虑到 QISS 非侵入性无增强磁共振血管成像具有较高的诊断性能,可用于检测和排除 PAD,其图像质量优于有创 CO2 血管造影。

相似文献

1
Multi-observer comparison study between unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography and invasive carbon dioxide angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease and chronic renal insufficiency.多观察者对比研究:在外周动脉疾病合并慢性肾功能不全患者中,应用非增强静息期单次激发磁共振血管成像与有创二氧化碳血管成像的对比。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Nov;108:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
2
Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.非对比性静息期单次激发下肢磁共振血管成像与 CT 血管成像诊断外周动脉疾病的准确性:与数字减影血管造影的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.030. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
3
The diagnostic value of non-contrast enhanced quiescent interval single shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3T for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, in comparison to CT angiography.3T下非对比增强静息期单次激发(QISS)磁共振血管造影对下肢外周动脉疾病的诊断价值与CT血管造影的比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Oct 20;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0294-6.
4
Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.3.0T 时基于小腿压迫的对比增强磁共振血管成像与数字减影血管造影评估糖尿病合并严重肢体缺血患者间歇期单次激发磁共振血管成像的比较
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Feb;26(1):44-53. doi: 10.1177/1526602818817887. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
5
ECG-gated quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial experience at 3 T.ECG 门控静息间期单次激发下肢磁共振血管成像:3T 初步经验。
Clin Radiol. 2014 May;69(5):485-91. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
6
Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography May Outperform Carbon-Dioxide Digital Subtraction Angiography in Chronic Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease.静态间隔单次磁共振血管造影在慢性下肢外周动脉疾病中可能优于二氧化碳数字减影血管造影。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 1;11(15):4485. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154485.
7
Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in critical limb ischemia: performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and TSE-based subtraction techniques.临界肢体缺血的非增强磁共振血管造影:静态间隔单次激发(QISS)和基于快速自旋回波(TSE)的减影技术的性能
Eur Radiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):1218-1226. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4448-6. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
8
Accuracy of non-contrast quiescent-interval single-shot and quiescent-interval single-shot arterial spin-labelled magnetic resonance angiography in assessment of peripheral arterial disease in a diabetic population.非对比性静息间期单次激发和静息间期单次激发动脉自旋标记磁共振血管成像在外周动脉疾病评估中的准确性:糖尿病患者人群研究。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb;64(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12987.
9
Non-contrast-enhanced MR-angiography (MRA) of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease at 3 tesla: Examination time and diagnostic performance of 2D quiescent-interval single-shot MRA vs. 3D fast spin-Echo MRA.3T 下肢外周动脉疾病非增强磁共振血管成像(MRA):2D 静止间期单次激发 MRA 与 3D 快速自旋回波 MRA 的检查时间和诊断性能比较。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Feb;76:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
10
Evaluating peripheral arterial disease with unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography at 3 T.3T 无对比剂静息间期单次激发 MR 血管成像评估外周动脉疾病。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Apr;202(4):886-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11243.

引用本文的文献

1
Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography May Outperform Carbon-Dioxide Digital Subtraction Angiography in Chronic Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease.静态间隔单次磁共振血管造影在慢性下肢外周动脉疾病中可能优于二氧化碳数字减影血管造影。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 1;11(15):4485. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154485.
2
A meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of quiescent-interval-single-shot magnetic resonance angiography in peripheral arterial disease.间歇期单次激发磁共振血管成像在外周动脉疾病中的诊断性能的荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2393-2403. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08349-z. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
3
The diagnostic value of non-contrast magnetic resonance coronary angiography in the assessment of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
非增强磁共振冠状动脉血管造影在冠状动脉疾病评估中的诊断价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 18;7(3):e06386. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06386. eCollection 2021 Mar.