Li Yi, Fitzgibbons Timothy P, McManus David D, Goddeau Richard P, Silver Brian, Henninger Nils
Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Feb;28(2):371-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
Heart failure (HF) is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, and post-stroke disability. However, differing definitions and application of HF-criteria may impact model prediction. We compared the predictive ability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a readily available objective echocardiographic index, with clinical HF definitions for functional disability and AF in stroke patients.
We retrospectively analyzed ischemic stroke patients evaluated between January 2013 and May 2015. Outcomes of interest were: (a) 90-day functional disability (modified Rankin score 3-6) and (b) AF. We compared: (1) LVEF (continuous variable), (2) left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD)-categories (absent to severe), (3) clinical history of HF, and (4) HF/LVSD-categories: (i) HF absent without LVSD, (ii) HF absent with LVSD, (iii) HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and (iv) HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the predictive ability for 90-day disability and AF, respectively.
Six hundred eighty five consecutive patients (44.5% female) fulfilled the study criteria and were included. After adjustment, the LVEF was independently associated with 90-day disability (OR .98, 95% CI .96-.99, P = .011) with similar predictive ability (area under the curve [AUC] = .85) to models including the LVSD-categories (AUC = .85), clinically define HF (AUC = .86), and HF/LVSD-categories (AUC = .86). The LVEF, HF, LVSD-, and HF/LVSD-categories were independently associated with AF (P < .01, each) with similar predictive ability (AUC = .74, .74, .73, and .75, respectively).
Compared to commonly defined HF definitions, the objectively determined LVEF possesses comparable predictive ability for 90-day disability and AF in stroke patients.
心力衰竭(HF)是心房颤动(AF)、中风及中风后残疾的一个风险因素。然而,HF标准的不同定义和应用可能会影响模型预测。我们比较了左心室射血分数(LVEF)(一种易于获得的客观超声心动图指标)与临床HF定义对中风患者功能残疾和AF的预测能力。
我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2015年5月期间评估的缺血性中风患者。感兴趣的结局为:(a)90天功能残疾(改良Rankin评分3 - 6分)和(b)AF。我们比较了:(1)LVEF(连续变量),(2)左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)类别(无至重度),(3)HF临床病史,以及(4)HF/LVSD类别:(i)无LVSD的无HF,(ii)有LVSD的无HF,(iii)射血分数保留的HF(HFpEF),以及(iv)射血分数降低的HF(HFrEF)。多变量逻辑回归分别用于确定90天残疾和AF的预测能力。
685例连续患者(44.5%为女性)符合研究标准并被纳入。调整后,LVEF与90天残疾独立相关(OR 0.98,95% CI 0.96 - 0.99,P = 0.011),其预测能力(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.85)与包括LVSD类别(AUC = 0.85)、临床定义的HF(AUC = 0.86)和HF/LVSD类别(AUC = 0.86)的模型相似。LVEF、HF、LVSD和HF/LVSD类别均与AF独立相关(P均<0.01),预测能力相似(AUC分别为0.74、0.74、0.73和0.75)。
与常用的HF定义相比,客观测定的LVEF对中风患者90天残疾和AF具有相当的预测能力。