Masuda Toshiro, Margonis Georgios Antonios, Andreatos Nikolaos, Wang Jaeyun, Warner Samuel, Mirza Muhammad Bilal, Angelou Anastasios, Damaskos Christos, Garmpis Nikolaos, Sasaki Kazunari, He Jin, Imai Katsunori, Yamashita Yo-Ichi, Wolfgang Christopher L, Baba Hideo, Weiss Matthew J
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Anticancer Res. 2018 Nov;38(11):6353-6360. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12993.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is thought to result in inferior prognosis than hepatic resection among patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, resection plus RFA may be an option for patients with a large number of tumors (≥4 liver lesions) and borderline resectability.
A total of 717 patients with CRLM who underwent hepatic resection +/- RFA at two tertiary institutions between 09/01/2000-12/01/2015 were eligible for inclusion in this study.
Among patients with <4 lesions (n=568), OS in the resection + RFA group (n=48) was significantly worse than in the resection alone group (n=520) (5-year OS: 34.4 % versus 58.9%, p=0.007). Conversely, in patients with ≥4 lesions, OS in the resection + RFA (n=68) and resection alone(n=81) groups were not significantly different (5-year OS: 31.9% versus 34.1%, p=0.48). In patients with <4 lesions, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ≥30 ng/ml, extrahepatic metastasis, preoperative chemotherapy and resection + RFA were independently associated with poor prognosis. Interestingly, in patients with ≥4 lesions, positive primary lymph nodes, KRAS mutation, CEA ≥30 ng/ml and extrahepatic metastasis were independent predictors of poor prognosis; however, the combination of hepatic resection with RFA was not associated with worse survival (p=0.93).
Although surgeons should always strive for R0 resection when feasible, combined resection and RFA may be a viable alternative for CRLM patients with a large number of tumors.
背景/目的:对于结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者,射频消融(RFA)被认为预后比肝切除差。然而,对于肿瘤数量较多(≥4个肝转移灶)且可切除性临界的患者,切除加RFA可能是一种选择。
2000年9月1日至2015年12月1日期间,在两家三级医疗机构接受肝切除±RFA的717例CRLM患者符合本研究纳入标准。
在病灶数<4个的患者(n = 568)中,切除加RFA组(n = 48)的总生存期(OS)显著差于单纯切除组(n = 520)(5年总生存率:34.4%对58.9%,p = 0.007)。相反,在病灶数≥4个的患者中,切除加RFA组(n = 68)和单纯切除组(n = 81)的总生存期无显著差异(5年总生存率:31.9%对34.1%,p = 0.48)。在病灶数<4个的患者中,癌胚抗原(CEA)≥30 ng/ml、肝外转移、术前化疗和切除加RFA与预后不良独立相关。有趣的是,在病灶数≥4个的患者中,原发淋巴结阳性、KRAS突变、CEA≥30 ng/ml和肝外转移是预后不良的独立预测因素;然而,肝切除联合RFA与较差的生存率无关(p = 0.93)。
尽管外科医生在可行时应始终争取R0切除,但对于肿瘤数量较多的CRLM患者,联合切除和RFA可能是一种可行的替代方案。