Masuda Toshiro, Beppu Toru, Okabe Hirohisa, Imai Katsunori, Hayashi Hiromitsu
Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Yamaga 861-0593, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;17(2):199. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020199.
Thermal ablation has been widely used for patients with small colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), even for resectable cases; however, solid evidence has been scarce. Some propensity-score matching studies using patients with balanced baseline characteristics have confirmed less invasiveness and the comparable survival benefits of thermal ablation to liver resection. A more recent pivotal randomized controlled trial comparing thermal ablation and liver resection was presented during the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2024 meeting. Diameter ≤ 3 cm, ten or fewer resectable and ablatable CRLMs were assigned to thermal ablation or liver resection. No differences were observed in the overall survival and local and distant progression-free survival with less morbidity. Four matching studies demonstrated comparable data between the combination and liver resection alone groups in the long-term survival and recurrence rates without increasing the postoperative complication rates. The selection of the two approaches depends primarily on the number, size, and location of the CRLMs. A propensity-score matching study comparing thermal ablation ± neoadjuvant chemotherapy was conducted. The addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was an independent predictive factor for good progression-free survival without increasing morbidity. Two randomized controlled trials demonstrated that additional thermal ablation to systemic chemotherapy can improve the overall survival for initially unresectable CRLMs. Thermal ablation can provide survival benefits for patients with CRLMs in various situations, keeping adequate indications.
热消融已广泛应用于小的结直肠癌肝转移(CRLMs)患者,甚至对于可切除病例也是如此;然而,确凿的证据却很少。一些使用基线特征均衡的患者进行的倾向评分匹配研究证实,热消融与肝切除相比,侵袭性更小且生存获益相当。一项比较热消融和肝切除的近期关键随机对照试验在美国临床肿瘤学会2024年年会上公布。直径≤3 cm、可切除和可消融的CRLMs为10个或更少的患者被分配接受热消融或肝切除。在总生存期、局部和远处无进展生存期方面未观察到差异,且发病率更低。四项匹配研究表明,联合治疗组和单纯肝切除组在长期生存率和复发率方面的数据相当,且未增加术后并发症发生率。这两种方法的选择主要取决于CRLMs的数量、大小和位置。开展了一项比较热消融±新辅助化疗的倾向评分匹配研究。新辅助化疗的加入是无进展生存期良好的独立预测因素,且未增加发病率。两项随机对照试验表明,在全身化疗基础上加用热消融可提高初始不可切除CRLMs患者的总生存期。热消融可为各种情况下的CRLMs患者提供生存获益,同时保持适当的适应证。