Deconinck Shannen, Tersteeg Claudia, Bailleul Els, Delrue Leen, Vandeputte Nele, Pareyn Inge, Itzhar-Baikian Nathalie, Deckmyn Hans, De Meyer Simon F, Vanderheyden Marc, Vanhoorelbeke Karen
Laboratory for Thrombosis Research IRF Life Sciences KU Leuven Campus Kulak Kortrijk Kortrijk Belgium.
Cardiovascular Center Aalst OLV Hospital Aalst Belgium.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018 Oct 8;2(4):762-766. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12150. eCollection 2018 Oct.
Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2A or acquired von Willebrand syndrome (aVWS) as a consequence of implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are both characterized by a loss of von Willebrand factor (VWF) function. Loss of VWF function is however more severe in VWD type 2A than in LVAD patients.
To compare VWF function in patients with VWD type 2A and LVAD-induced aVWS to highlight the differences in VWF activity and to stress the importance of VWF multimer analysis for correct diagnosis of aVWS in LVAD patients.
PATIENTS/METHODS: Plasma samples from nine VWD type 2A, nine LVAD patients, and 20 healthy donors (HD) were analyzed for VWF function (VWF:CB/VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag) and loss of high molecular weight (HMW) VWF multimers
A severely impaired VWF function was indeed confirmed in all VWD 2A patients. HMW VWF multimers were severely reduced compared to HD (0% [0, 12.29] vs 34.19% [31.68, 38.88] for HD, <0.001) and this loss was reflected by VWF:CB/VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios <0.7. In contrast, VWF function was less affected in LVAD patients. Although HMW VWF multimers were reduced in all patients (20.31% [15.84, 21.71], vs 34.19% [31.68, 38.88] for HD, <0.001), six out of nine LVAD patients had normal VWF:CB/VWF:Ag or VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios (>0.7).
VWF:CB/VWF:Ag or VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag analysis allows detection of impaired VWF function in VWD type 2A but not always in LVAD-induced aVWS patients. In contrast, VWF multimeric analysis allows detection of the loss of HMW VWF multimers in both groups of patients. Hence, performing VWF multimer analysis is crucial to detect aVWS in LVAD patients.
2A型血管性血友病(VWD)患者或因植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)导致获得性血管性血友病综合征(aVWS)的患者,均具有血管性血友病因子(VWF)功能丧失的特征。然而,2A型VWD患者的VWF功能丧失比LVAD患者更为严重。
比较2A型VWD患者和LVAD诱导的aVWS患者的VWF功能,以突出VWF活性的差异,并强调VWF多聚体分析对正确诊断LVAD患者aVWS的重要性。
患者/方法:分析了9例2A型VWD患者、9例LVAD患者和20名健康供者(HD)的血浆样本的VWF功能(VWF:CB/VWF:Ag和VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag)以及高分子量(HMW)VWF多聚体的缺失情况。
所有2A型VWD患者的VWF功能确实严重受损。与HD相比,HMW VWF多聚体严重减少(HD为34.19%[31.68, 38.88],2A型VWD患者为0%[0, 12.29],P<0.001),这种减少通过VWF:CB/VWF:Ag和VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag比值<0.7得以体现。相比之下,LVAD患者的VWF功能受影响较小。虽然所有患者的HMW VWF多聚体均减少(LVAD患者为20.31%[15.84, 21.71],HD为34.19%[31.68, 38.88],P<0.001),但9例LVAD患者中有6例的VWF:CB/VWF:Ag或VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag比值正常(>0.7)。
VWF:CB/VWF:Ag或VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag分析可检测出2A型VWD患者的VWF功能受损,但在LVAD诱导的aVWS患者中并非总是如此。相比之下,VWF多聚体分析可检测出两组患者中HMW VWF多聚体的缺失。因此,进行VWF多聚体分析对于检测LVAD患者的aVWS至关重要。