Suppr超能文献

AuraGain喉罩和i-Gel喉罩用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的全身麻醉。性能特点及对血流动力学的影响。

AuraGain and i-Gel laryngeal masks in general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Performance characteristics and effects on hemodynamics.

作者信息

Sabuncu Ulku, Kusderci Hatice S, Oterkus Mesut, Abdullayev Ruslan, Demir Asli, Uludag Oznur, Ozdas Sabri, Goksu Mustafa

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Yuksek Ihtisas Research and Educational Hospital, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2018 Nov;39(11):1082-1089. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.11.22346.

Abstract

To evaluate and compare the performances of new types of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) with endotracheal intubation regarding their ease of insertions, perioperative complications, and effects on hemodynamic parameters and peak airway pressures in laparascopic cholecystectomy (LC).  Methods: One hundred and fourteen patients with ASA 1-2 physical status scheduled for elective LC were recruited for this prospective randomized controlled trial. The study was completed between January  2016 and January 2017 in Adiyaman University Research and Educational Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey. The patients were divided into AuraGain(Ambu, Ballerup, Denmark) (n=38), i-Gel® (Intersurgical Ltd, UK) (n=35), and endotracheal tube (ETT)(n=32) groups. Ease of insertion, airway pressures, complications, and hemodynamic variables were compared. Results: The trial was completed with 105 patients. Ease of insertion for SADs which was evaluated with insertion procedure duration, attempts, first insertion success rates, and oropharyngeal leak pressures were similar between the groups. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial pressures, and peak airway pressures were significantly lower in the AuraGain and i-Gel® groups, compared with the ETT, p less than 0.017. Conclusion: Both AuraGain and i-Gel® SADs are comparable with ETT used for airway control in general anesthesia for LC, regarding application ease and perioperative complications. Favorable hemodynamic responses to AuraGain and i-Gel® SADs may put them in a better place than ETT.

摘要

评估并比较新型声门上气道装置(SADs)与气管插管在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中的插入难易程度、围手术期并发症以及对血流动力学参数和气道峰值压力的影响。方法:本前瞻性随机对照试验招募了114例计划行择期LC且ASA身体状况为1 - 2级的患者。该研究于2016年1月至2017年1月在土耳其阿迪雅曼市阿迪雅曼大学研究与教育医院完成。患者被分为AuraGain(丹麦阿美普医疗公司,巴勒鲁普)组(n = 38)、i - Gel®组(英国英特外科有限公司)(n = 35)和气管插管(ETT)组(n = 32)。比较插入难易程度、气道压力、并发症和血流动力学变量。结果:105例患者完成试验。通过插入操作持续时间、尝试次数、首次插入成功率和口咽漏气压评估的SADs插入难易程度在各组之间相似。与ETT组相比,AuraGain组和i - Gel®组的心率、动脉收缩压和舒张压以及气道峰值压力显著更低,p小于0.017。结论:就应用难易程度和围手术期并发症而言,AuraGain和i - Gel® SADs与用于LC全身麻醉气道控制的ETT相当。AuraGain和i - Gel® SADs良好的血流动力学反应可能使其比ETT更具优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f60/6274663/bc572572a7e6/SaudiMedJ-39-1082-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验