Osteresch Rico, Diehl Kathrin, Kühl Matthias, Fiehn Eduard, Schmucker Johannes, Backhaus Tina, Fach Andreas, Wienbergen Harm, Hambrecht Rainer
Institut für Herz- und Kreislaufforschung am Klinikum Links der Weser Bremen (BIHKF), Bremen, Germany.
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Dec;31(6):916-924. doi: 10.1111/joic.12566. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
To evaluate the impact of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) on outcome after transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).
One hundred thirty patients (median age 72.7 ± 10.7 years; 63.8% male) at high operative risk (LogEuroSCORE 23.8 ± 13.9%) with FMR and CHF (left ventricular ejection fraction 32 ± 7%) were enrolled and separated into two groups according to the RVD. RVD was assessed by the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) method (A: TAPSE ≤ 16 mm, n = 58; B: TAPSE > 16 mm, n = 72). The rate of successful reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR ≤2+) by TMVR was similar in both groups (94.6% vs 91.2%; P: n.s.) with low in-hospital major adverse event rates. During a median follow-up period of 10.5 ± 4 months, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher all-cause mortality in group A (43.1% vs 23.6%; log-rank P = 0.039) and a significantly higher rate of hospital readmission due to congestive heart failure (56.9% vs 26.4%; log-rank P < 0.001). At long-term follow-up, 25% of patients in group A remained in NYHA functional class IV (none in group B). Preexisting RVD as assessed by TAPSE and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI-S') was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality after TMVR (hazard ratio 2.84; 95% confidence interval 1.15-7.65; P = 0.039; hazard ratio 4.70; 95% confidence interval 1.14-20.21; P = 0.044, respectively).
Patients with CHF and RVD were with regard to functional capacity less often responder and showed an unfavorable long-term outcome. Thus, patients with CHF and RVD seem to benefit less frequently from TMVR.
评估右心室功能障碍(RVD)对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)和严重功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)患者经导管二尖瓣修复术(TMVR)后预后的影响。
纳入130例高手术风险(LogEuroSCORE 23.8±13.9%)的FMR和CHF患者(中位年龄72.7±10.7岁;63.8%为男性),左心室射血分数32±7%,根据RVD分为两组。采用三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)方法评估RVD(A组:TAPSE≤16mm,n = 58;B组:TAPSE>16mm,n = 72)。两组TMVR成功降低二尖瓣反流(MR≤2+)的比例相似(94.6%对91.2%;P:无统计学差异),住院期间主要不良事件发生率较低。在中位随访期10.5±4个月期间,Kaplan-Meier分析显示A组全因死亡率显著更高(43.1%对23.6%;对数秩检验P = 0.039),因充血性心力衰竭再次住院的比例显著更高(56.9%对26.4%;对数秩检验P<0.001)。在长期随访中,A组25%的患者仍处于纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能IV级(B组无)。通过TAPSE和多普勒组织成像(DTI-S')评估的既往RVD是TMVR后全因死亡率的独立预测因素(风险比2.84;95%置信区间1.15 - 7.65;P = 0.039;风险比4.70;95%置信区间1.14 - 20.21;P = 0.044)。
CHF和RVD患者在功能能力方面较少有反应者,且长期预后不佳。因此,CHF和RVD患者似乎较少从TMVR中获益。