1 Department of Medicine, Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California , San Diego, La Jolla, California.
2 School of Social Work, San Diego State University , San Diego, California.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Nov;32(11):438-449. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0128.
This study assesses effects of a community-based intervention across seven sites in the United States on HIV care utilization and study retention, among people living with HIV (PLWH). A two-armed study was conducted from 2013 to 2016 in each of seven community-based agencies across the United States. Each site conducted interventions involving community engagement approaches in the form of case management or patient navigation. Control conditions were standard of care involving referral to HIV clinical care. Participants (N = 583) were adults reporting erratic or no HIV care in the past 6 months. Longitudinal survey data on demographics, behavioral risks, and HIV care were collected from participants at baseline, before service delivery, and at 6-month follow-up. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the intervention effects on HIV care utilization and study retention. Participants were majority black (75.5%), cisgender male (55.1%), and heterosexual (55.4%). No significant intervention effect was observed on HIV care utilization, although both groups improved significantly over time [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-3.37]. Intervention participants were more likely to be retained in the study (AOR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03-2.20). Community intervention did not affect HIV care utilization more than standard of care, but intervention participants were more likely to be retained in the study, suggesting that such approaches support relationship building in ways that can facilitate follow-up of socially vulnerable PLWH. More research is needed to understand how such community efforts can support better HIV care utilization in these populations.
本研究评估了美国七个地点的基于社区的干预措施对艾滋病毒护理利用和研究保留的影响,对象为艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)。这项为期两年的研究于 2013 年至 2016 年在美国七个社区机构的每个机构进行。每个地点都进行了涉及社区参与方法的干预措施,形式为病例管理或患者导航。对照条件是标准的护理,包括转介到艾滋病毒临床护理。参与者(N=583)为过去 6 个月报告不规则或没有艾滋病毒护理的成年人。在服务提供之前和 6 个月随访时,从参与者那里收集了关于人口统计学、行为风险和艾滋病毒护理的纵向调查数据。使用未调整和调整后的广义线性混合模型来评估干预措施对艾滋病毒护理利用和研究保留的影响。参与者主要是黑人(75.5%)、跨性别男性(55.1%)和异性恋(55.4%)。虽然两组在过去都有显著改善,但未观察到 HIV 护理利用的显著干预效果[调整后的优势比(AOR):2.09,95%置信区间(CI):1.30-3.37]。干预组更有可能保留在研究中(AOR:1.50,95% CI:1.03-2.20)。社区干预并没有比标准护理更能影响艾滋病毒护理的利用,但干预组更有可能保留在研究中,这表明这种方法以促进社会弱势 PLWH 随访的方式有助于建立关系。需要进一步研究来了解这些社区努力如何能够支持这些人群更好地利用艾滋病毒护理。