Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SHARE INDIA, MediCiti Institute of Medical Sciences, Medchal Mandal, Telangana State, 501401, India.
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1324-3.
Previous studies have found a relationship between cesarean section delivery and adverse outcomes in the offspring, partially attributing these findings to differential development of immunity in infants delivered by cesarean compared to vaginal delivery. The purpose of this study is to determine whether cesarean section delivery is associated with higher reports of adverse short-term infant health outcomes in a peri-urban Indian population.
Data from a prospective pregnancy cohort study in a peri-urban region of Telangana State, India, were analyzed to assess the association between mode of delivery, cesarean section or vaginal, and maternal report of recent infant diarrhea and/or respiratory symptoms at a 6 month follow-up visit. Inverse probability weights were applied to log-binomial regression models to account for maternal pre-pregnancy, prenatal, and labor and delivery factors.
Of the 851 singleton infants delivered between 2010 and 2015, 46.7% were delivered by cesarean. Cesarean delivery was not associated with an increased report of infants having one or more of the outcomes (diarrhea, respiratory infection, or difficulty breathing) at 6 months (adjusted risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.03), nor was it associated with infants having a more severe outcome of comorbid diarrhea and respiratory infection (adjusted risk ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.58-2.04).
Unlike findings in Western populations, in this peri-urban Indian population, cesarean delivery was not associated with higher reports of short-term adverse gastrointestinal or respiratory infant outcomes after accounting for pre-delivery maternal factors. Future research in this cohort could elucidate whether mode of delivery is associated with other adverse outcomes later in childhood.
先前的研究发现剖宫产分娩与后代的不良结局之间存在关联,部分原因是剖宫产分娩的婴儿与阴道分娩的婴儿相比,其免疫发育存在差异。本研究旨在确定在印度城乡结合部人群中,剖宫产分娩是否与不良短期婴儿健康结局的报告发生率更高有关。
分析了印度特兰加纳邦城乡结合部一项前瞻性妊娠队列研究的数据,以评估分娩方式(剖宫产或阴道分娩)与 6 个月随访时母亲报告的近期婴儿腹泻和/或呼吸道症状之间的关联。采用逆概率权重对数二项回归模型来校正产妇孕前、产前和分娩及分娩因素。
在 2010 年至 2015 年间分娩的 851 例单胎婴儿中,有 46.7%为剖宫产分娩。剖宫产分娩与婴儿在 6 个月时有一个或多个结局(腹泻、呼吸道感染或呼吸困难)的报告发生率增加无关(调整后的风险比 0.89,95%置信区间 0.76-1.03),也与婴儿同时患有腹泻和呼吸道感染的更严重结局无关(调整后的风险比 1.08,95%置信区间 0.58-2.04)。
与西方人群的研究结果不同,在本城乡结合部印度人群中,在考虑到分娩前的产妇因素后,剖宫产分娩与短期不良胃肠道或呼吸道婴儿结局的报告发生率增加无关。本队列的未来研究可以阐明分娩方式是否与儿童后期的其他不良结局有关。