Towner D, Castro M A, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert W M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Davis-Sacramento 95817, USA.
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 2;341(23):1709-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412301.
Infants delivered by vacuum extraction or other operative techniques may be more likely to sustain major injuries than those delivered spontaneously, but the extent of the risk is unknown.
From a California data base, we identified 583,340 live-born singleton infants born to nulliparous women between 1992 and 1994 and weighing between 2500 and 4000 g. One third of the infants were delivered by operative techniques. We evaluated the relation between the mode of delivery and morbidity in the infants.
Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1 of 860 infants delivered by vacuum extraction, 1 of 664 delivered with the use of forceps, 1 of 907 delivered by cesarean section during labor, 1 of 2750 delivered by cesarean section with no labor, and 1 of 1900 delivered spontaneously. As compared with the infants delivered spontaneously, those delivered by vacuum extraction had a significantly higher rate of subdural or cerebral hemorrhage (odds ratio, 2.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 3.9), as did the infants delivered with the use of forceps (odds ratio, 3.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 5.9) or cesarean section during labor (odds ratio, 2.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 3.4), but the rate of subdural or cerebral hemorrhage associated with vacuum extraction did not differ significantly from that associated with forceps use (odds ratio for the comparison with vacuum extraction, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.2) or cesarean section during labor (odds ratio, 0.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 1.4).
The rate of intracranial hemorrhage is higher among infants delivered by vacuum extraction, forceps, or cesarean section during labor than among infants delivered spontaneously, but the rate among infants delivered by cesarean section before labor is not higher, suggesting that the common risk factor for hemorrhage is abnormal labor.
与自然分娩的婴儿相比,经真空吸引或其他手术技术分娩的婴儿更有可能遭受严重伤害,但风险程度尚不清楚。
从加利福尼亚州的数据库中,我们识别出1992年至1994年间出生的、体重在2500克至4000克之间的初产妇单胎活产婴儿583340例。其中三分之一的婴儿通过手术技术分娩。我们评估了分娩方式与婴儿发病率之间的关系。
在860例经真空吸引分娩的婴儿中,有1例发生颅内出血;在664例使用产钳分娩的婴儿中,有1例发生颅内出血;在907例产时剖宫产的婴儿中,有1例发生颅内出血;在2750例未临产剖宫产的婴儿中,有1例发生颅内出血;在1900例自然分娩的婴儿中,有1例发生颅内出血。与自然分娩的婴儿相比,经真空吸引分娩的婴儿发生硬膜下或脑内出血的几率显著更高(优势比为2.7;95%置信区间为1.9至3.9),使用产钳分娩的婴儿也是如此(优势比为3.4;95%置信区间为1.9至5.9),产时剖宫产的婴儿同样如此(优势比为2.5;95%置信区间为1.8至3.4),但与真空吸引相关的硬膜下或脑内出血发生率与使用产钳(与真空吸引比较的优势比为1.2;95%置信区间为0.7至2.2)或产时剖宫产(优势比为0.9;95%置信区间为0.6至1.4)相比,差异无统计学意义。
与自然分娩的婴儿相比,经真空吸引、产钳或产时剖宫产分娩的婴儿颅内出血发生率更高,但未临产剖宫产分娩的婴儿颅内出血发生率并不更高,这表明出血的常见危险因素是异常分娩。