Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Kuwana City Medical Center, 3-11 Kotobuki-cho, Kuwana, Mie, 511-0061, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2019 Jan;42(1):40-51. doi: 10.1038/s41440-018-0126-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
It remains unknown which surrogate markers can predict diagnostic test results for primary hyperaldosteronism (PA). The Secondary Hypertension Registry Investigation in Mie Prefecture (SHRIMP) study has sequentially and prospectively recruited 128 patients with hypertension with an aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) greater than 20, evaluated the differences among essential hypertension (EHT), idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA), and aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA), and analyzed the predictors for the confirmatory tests. The patients underwent saline-loading, captopril-challenge, and upright furosemide-loading tests. Carotid, renovascular, and cardiac echography, brachial ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), endothelial function, nocturnal blood pressure decline, and the apnea hypopnea index were evaluated. Multivariate regression analyses showed that the plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) at screening was a strong predictor of the saline and captopril test results. The plasma renin activity (PRA) at screening, urine β2-microglobulin, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were independent predictors for the captopril test. The estimated saline PAC and captopril 60 and 90 min ARRs predicted by the equations were highly correlated with the real values. The ROC curve analysis showed PAC at screening among each of predictors for the diagnostic tests and PAC after the saline-loading test had the highest diagnostic abilities of APA. Patients with IHA were older and had glucose intolerance and increased U-Alb/gCre and resistive indices. In patients with APA, the levels of U-Alb/gCre and urine β2-microglobulin were increased, and levels of insulin and the HOMA-IR were decreased. In conclusion, our proposed equations may be useful for estimating saline PAC and captopril ARR. Diagnostic predictors may differ for each confirmatory test.
醛固酮增多症的诊断试验结果的预测替代标志物仍不明确。三重奏研究(SHRIMP)连续前瞻性地招募了 128 例醛固酮/肾素比值(ARR)大于 20 的高血压患者,评估了原发性醛固酮增多症(IHA)、特发性醛固酮增多症(IHA)和醛固酮瘤(APA)之间的差异,并分析了确认性试验的预测因素。患者接受盐水负荷、卡托普利挑战和直立呋塞米负荷试验。评估颈动脉、肾血管和心脏超声、肱踝脉搏波速度(baPWV)、内皮功能、夜间血压下降和呼吸暂停低通气指数。多变量回归分析显示,筛选时的血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)是盐水和卡托普利试验结果的强预测因子。筛选时的血浆肾素活性(PRA)、尿β2-微球蛋白和左心室质量指数(LVMI)是卡托普利试验的独立预测因子。通过方程预测的盐水 PAC 和卡托普利 60 和 90 分钟 ARR 与真实值高度相关。ROC 曲线分析显示,在每种诊断试验的预测因素中,筛选时的 PAC 和盐水负荷试验后的 PAC 对 APA 的诊断能力最高。IHA 患者年龄较大,有葡萄糖耐量异常和 U-Alb/gCre 增加和阻力指数增加。在 APA 患者中,U-Alb/gCre 和尿β2-微球蛋白水平升高,胰岛素和 HOMA-IR 水平降低。总之,我们提出的方程可能有助于估计盐水 PAC 和卡托普利 ARR。每个确认性试验的诊断预测因素可能不同。