Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5C1, Canada. Current Address: Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital, 25 King Street West, Kingston, ON, K7L 5P9, Canada.
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Nov 7;63(21):21NT02. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae79d.
Optical cone beam computed tomography (CT), using a digital camera to acquire 2D projection images, provides a fast, mechanically simple method for 3D radiation dosimetry. However, original cone beam designs had poor accuracy as a result of considerable scatter/stray light reaching the camera. Previously, our group presented a redesigned convergent light source for optical cone beam CT that considerably reduced stray light contribution and improved accuracy (Dekker et al 2016 Phys. Med. Biol. 61 2910). Here, we performed an evaluation of a newly updated commercial optical cone beam CT scanner (Vista, ModusQA, London, Canada) based on that design. Two different light source configurations were examined: the manufacturer's default configuration which uses a 10 cm wide, 5 cm high diffuser light source, and a smaller, 1.5 cm diameter diffuser light source that more closely aligns with our previously described design. We imaged large volume (15 cm diameter cylinders) absorbing and scattering solution phantoms as well as a 1.25 cm diameter absorber placed within 15 cm diameter gel-like scattering phantom. Optical CT reconstructions were compared against narrow-beam measurements of attenuation made by placing an aperture in the optical CT system. Our results show that considerable stray light is present when using the manufacturer's default configuration, as cupping artifacts and large (⩾10%) discrepancies between optical CT and narrow-beam attenuation measurements occur when imaging scattering phantoms. However, when imaging is performed using the 1.5 cm diameter source, optical CT measurements agree with narrow-beam measurements within ∼3% for both absorbing and scattering objects, as well as the small absorber in a scattering medium. Using this light source will require higher optical quality vessels than are currently provided by the manufacturer.
光学锥形束计算机断层扫描(CT)使用数码相机获取二维投影图像,为三维辐射剂量测量提供了一种快速、机械简单的方法。然而,由于相当数量的散射/杂散光到达相机,原始的锥形束设计精度较差。以前,我们小组提出了一种重新设计的用于光学锥形束 CT 的会聚光源,该光源大大减少了杂散光的贡献,提高了精度(Dekker 等人,2016 年,《物理医学与生物学》,61 卷,2910 页)。在这里,我们根据该设计对新更新的商业光学锥形束 CT 扫描仪(Vista,ModusQA,伦敦,加拿大)进行了评估。检查了两种不同的光源配置:制造商的默认配置,使用 10cm 宽、5cm 高的扩散光源;以及更小的、直径为 1.5cm 的扩散光源,与我们之前描述的设计更匹配。我们对大体积(直径为 15cm 的圆柱体)吸收和散射溶液体模以及放置在直径为 15cm 的凝胶状散射体模内的 1.25cm 直径吸收体进行了光学 CT 成像。光学 CT 重建与在光学 CT 系统中放置孔径进行的窄束衰减测量进行了比较。我们的结果表明,当使用制造商的默认配置时,存在相当大的杂散光,因为在对散射体模成像时,会出现杯状伪影和光学 CT 与窄束衰减测量之间的大(≥10%)差异。然而,当使用 1.5cm 直径的光源进行成像时,光学 CT 测量与窄束测量的吸收和散射物体以及散射介质中的小吸收体之间的差异在 3%以内。使用这种光源将需要比制造商目前提供的更高质量的光学容器。