• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮左心室辅助装置在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克中的应用:12 年 AMC 经验。

Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience.

机构信息

1 Heart Center; department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.

2 Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Jun;8(4):338-349. doi: 10.1177/2048872618805486. Epub 2018 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1177/2048872618805486
PMID:30403366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6616211/
Abstract

AIMS

Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients remains high. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with Impella can be used to support the circulation in these patients, but data from randomised controlled studies and 'real-world' data are sparse. The aim is to describe real-life data on outcomes and complications of our 12 years of clinical experience with Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction and to identify predictors of 6-month mortality.

METHODS

We describe a single-centre registry from October 2004 to December 2016 including all patients treated with Impella for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. We report outcomes and complications and identify predictors of 6-month mortality.

RESULTS

Our overall clinical experience consists of 250 patients treated with Impella 2.5, Impella CP or Impella 5.0. A total of 172 patients received Impella therapy for cardiogenic shock, of which 112 patients had cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. The mean age was 60.1±10.6 years, mean arterial pressure was 67 (56-77) mmHg, lactate was 6.2 (3.6-9.7) mmol/L, 87.5% were mechanically ventilated and 59.6% had a cardiac arrest before Impella placement. Overall 30-day mortality was 56.2% and 6-month mortality was 60.7%. Complications consisted of device-related vascular complications (17.0%), non-device-related bleeding (12.5%), haemolysis (7.1%) and stroke (3.6%). In a multivariate analysis, pH before Impella placement is a predictor of 6-month mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our registry shows that Impella treatment in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction is feasible, although mortality rates remain high and complications occur.

摘要

目的

心源性休克患者的死亡率仍然很高。短期机械循环支持使用 Impella 可以为这些患者循环提供支持,但随机对照研究和“真实世界”数据的数据仍然很少。目的是描述我们 12 年使用 Impella 治疗急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的临床经验的真实数据,并确定 6 个月死亡率的预测因素。

方法

我们描述了 2004 年 10 月至 2016 年 12 月期间的一项单中心登记研究,该研究纳入了所有使用 Impella 治疗急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的患者。我们报告了结果和并发症,并确定了 6 个月死亡率的预测因素。

结果

我们的整体临床经验包括 250 例使用 Impella 2.5、Impella CP 或 Impella 5.0 治疗的患者。共有 172 例患者接受了 Impella 治疗心源性休克,其中 112 例患者为急性心肌梗死后的心源性休克。患者平均年龄为 60.1±10.6 岁,平均动脉压为 67(56-77)mmHg,乳酸为 6.2(3.6-9.7)mmol/L,87.5%患者接受机械通气,59.6%患者在 Impella 植入前发生心脏骤停。总体 30 天死亡率为 56.2%,6 个月死亡率为 60.7%。并发症包括器械相关血管并发症(17.0%)、非器械相关出血(12.5%)、溶血(7.1%)和中风(3.6%)。多变量分析显示,Impella 植入前 pH 值是 6 个月死亡率的预测因素。

结论

我们的登记研究表明,急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者使用 Impella 治疗是可行的,尽管死亡率仍然很高,且会发生并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2e/6616211/221b1e5cd0f6/10.1177_2048872618805486-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2e/6616211/4ba406d10570/10.1177_2048872618805486-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2e/6616211/5a0d14f1548a/10.1177_2048872618805486-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2e/6616211/221b1e5cd0f6/10.1177_2048872618805486-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2e/6616211/4ba406d10570/10.1177_2048872618805486-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2e/6616211/5a0d14f1548a/10.1177_2048872618805486-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a2e/6616211/221b1e5cd0f6/10.1177_2048872618805486-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience.经皮左心室辅助装置在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克中的应用:12 年 AMC 经验。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Jun;8(4):338-349. doi: 10.1177/2048872618805486. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
2
Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock.109 例严重心源性休克患者应用 Impella CP、5.0 和 RP 的单中心经验。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Feb;7(1):53-61. doi: 10.1177/2048872617743194. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
3
Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry.经皮左心室辅助Impella-2.5 辅助装置在急性心源性休克中的应用:Impella-EUROSHOCK 注册研究结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Jan;6(1):23-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.967224. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.机械循环支持在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克中的应用:Impella CP/5.0 与 ECMO 比较。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Mar;9(2):164-172. doi: 10.1177/2048872619865891. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.在一家没有现场手术支持的农村社区医院,使用Impella进行血流动力学支持治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的结果。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Feb;31(2):E23-E29. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00252.
6
Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.经皮 Impella 辅助治疗伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死。
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):1249-1258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614.
7
Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.高容量 Impella 轴流泵支持下心源性休克患者的临床结局:心源性休克工作组的报告。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
8
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
9
Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.早期经皮 Impella 辅助治疗急性心肌梗死后并发心原性休克伴心脏骤停可改善短期和长期生存率。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;49(6):943-955. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004915.
10
Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持的当代趋势。
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 4;7(1):e001214. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent Use of Kidney Replacement Therapy and Temporary Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肾脏替代疗法与临时左心室辅助装置在心源性休克中的联合应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Blood Purif. 2025 Jun 18:1-16. doi: 10.1159/000546854.
2
Risk of acute ischemic stroke with early versus late initiation of mechanical circulatory support in hospitalizations with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a propensity-matched analysis.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克住院患者中早期与晚期启动机械循环支持的急性缺血性卒中风险:一项倾向匹配分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 May 17;25(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04810-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock.109 例严重心源性休克患者应用 Impella CP、5.0 和 RP 的单中心经验。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Feb;7(1):53-61. doi: 10.1177/2048872617743194. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
2
Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.经皮短期主动机械支持装置在心源性休克中的应用:一项随机试验的系统评价和协作荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 14;38(47):3523-3531. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx363.
3
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Timing of mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克时机械循环支持的时机:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Jan 30;50:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100506. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
The Role of Impella in Cardiogenic Shock Complicated by an Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis.Impella在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 18;14(2):611. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020611.
5
Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis.性别对心原性休克患者治疗效果和预后的影响:系统回顾和流行病学荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Jun 6;28(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04973-5.
6
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Heart Failure Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock.急性心力衰竭合并心源性休克的经皮机械循环支持
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 30;13(9):2642. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092642.
7
Association between Impella device support and elevated rates of gout flares: a retrospective propensity-matched study.Impella装置支持与痛风发作率升高之间的关联:一项回顾性倾向匹配研究。
BMC Rheumatol. 2024 Feb 29;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41927-024-00380-z.
8
Stroke and Mechanical Circulatory Support in Adults.成人中风与机械循环支持。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Dec;25(12):1665-1675. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01985-5. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
9
Clinical outcomes and predictors of success with Impella weaning in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.心源性休克患者使用Impella撤机的临床结局及成功预测因素:单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 21;10:1171956. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1171956. eCollection 2023.
10
Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses.用于心源性休克患者的Impella与体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO):全面系统文献综述与荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Apr 5;10(4):158. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10040158.
2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
4
Early Initiation of Impella in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Improves Survival: A Meta-Analysis.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克时早期应用Impella可改善生存率:一项荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 11;10(17):1805-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.027.
5
Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic Shock.早期启动机械循环支持对心源性休克患者生存率的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;119(6):845-851. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.037. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
6
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Treating Cardiogenic Shock: Meta-Analysis.经皮机械循环支持与主动脉内球囊反搏治疗心源性休克的Meta分析
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 24;69(3):358-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
7
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.经皮机械循环支持与急性心肌梗死后心源性休克中的主动脉内球囊反搏。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 24;69(3):278-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
The Impella CP device for acute mechanical circulatory support in refractory cardiac arrest.用于难治性心脏骤停急性机械循环支持的Impella CP装置。
Resuscitation. 2017 Mar;112:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
9
Use of the Impella Device for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock - Experience From a Single Heart Center With Analysis of Long-term Mortality.使用Impella装置治疗并发心源性休克的急性冠状动脉综合征——来自单一心脏中心的经验及长期死亡率分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Dec;28(12):467-472. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
Retrospective analysis of circulatory support with the Impella CP® device in patients with therapy refractory cardiogenic shock.对使用Impella CP®设备进行循环支持治疗难治性心源性休克患者的回顾性分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jun 14.