• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高容量 Impella 轴流泵支持下心源性休克患者的临床结局:心源性休克工作组的报告。

Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015
PMID:38834162
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Impella 5.0 and 5.5 pumps (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) are large-bore transvalvular micro-axial assist devices used in cardiogenic shock (CS) for patients requiring high-capacity flow. Despite their increasing use, real-world data regarding indications, rates of utilization and clinical outcomes with this therapy are limited. The objective of our study was to examine clinical profiles and outcomes of patients in a contemporary, real-world CS registry of patients who received an Impella 5.0/5.5 alone or in combination with other temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices.

METHODS

The CS Working Group (CSWG) Registry includes patients from 34 US hospitals. For this analysis, data from patients who received an Impella 5.0/5.5 between 2020-2023 were analyzed. Use of Impella 5.0/5.5 with or without additional tMCS therapies, duration of support, adverse events and outcomes at hospital discharge were studied. Adverse events including stroke, limb ischemia, bleeding and hemolysis were not standardized by the registry but reported per individual CSWG Primary Investigator discretion. For those who survived, rates of native heart recovery (NHR) or heart replacement therapy (HRT) including heart transplant (HT), or durable ventricular assist device (VAD) were recorded. We also assessed outcomes based on shock etiology (acute myocardial infarction or MI-CS vs. heart failure-related CS or HF-CS).

RESULTS

Among 6,205 patients, 754 received an Impella 5.0/5.5 (12.1%), including 210 MI-CS (27.8%) and 484 HF-CS (64.1%) patients. Impella 5.0/5.5 was used as the sole tMCS device in 32% of patients, while 68% of patients received a combination of tMCS devices. Impella cannulation sites were available for 524/754 (69.4%) of patients, with 93.5% axillary configuration. Survival to hospital discharge for those supported with an Impella 5.0/5.5 was 67%, with 20.4% NHR and 45.5% HRT. Compared to HF-CS, patients with MI-CS supported on Impella 5.0/5.5 had higher in-hospital mortality (45.2% vs 26.2%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to receive HRT (22.4% vs 56.6%, p < 0.001. For patients receiving a combination of tMCS during hospitalization, this was associated with higher rates of limb ischemia (9% vs. 3%, p < 0.01), bleeding (52% vs 33%, p < 0.01), and mortality (38% vs 25%; p < 0.001) compared to Impella 5.0/5.5 alone. Among Impella 5.0/5.5 recipients, the median duration of pump support was 12.9 days (IQR: 6.8-22.9) and longer in patients bridged to HRT (14 days; IQR: 7.7-28.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multi-center cohort of patients with CS, use of Impella 5.0/5.5 was associated with an overall survival of 67.1% and high rates of HRT. Lower adverse event rates were observed when Impella 5.0/5.5 was the sole support device used. Further study is required to determine whether a strategy of early Impella 5.0/5.5 use for CS improves survival.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

High capacity Impella heart pumps are capable of provide up to 5.5 liter/min of flow while upper body surgical placement allows for ambulation. Patients with advanced cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction or heart failure requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support may benefit from upfront use of Impella 5.5 to improve overall survival, including native heart recovery or successful bridge to durable left ventricular assist device surgery or heart transplantation.

摘要

背景

Impella 5.0 和 5.5 泵(Abiomed,马萨诸塞州丹弗斯)是用于心源性休克(CS)的大口径跨瓣微轴辅助装置,适用于需要高容量流量的患者。尽管它们的使用越来越多,但关于该治疗方法的适应症、使用率和临床结果的真实世界数据有限。我们的研究目的是检查接受 Impella 5.0/5.5 单独或与其他临时机械循环支持(tMCS)装置联合使用的 CS 注册患者的临床特征和结局。

方法

CS 工作组(CSWG)注册中心包括来自 34 家美国医院的患者。在这项分析中,分析了 2020-2023 年期间接受 Impella 5.0/5.5 的患者的数据。研究了 Impella 5.0/5.5 的使用情况,包括与其他 tMCS 治疗方法联合使用或不联合使用、支持时间、出院时的不良事件和结局。不良事件包括卒中、肢体缺血、出血和溶血,但该注册中心没有标准化,而是根据每个 CSWG 主要研究者的判断报告。对于那些存活的患者,记录了原生心脏恢复(NHR)或心脏替代治疗(HRT)的比率,包括心脏移植(HT)或耐用心室辅助装置(VAD)。我们还根据休克病因(急性心肌梗死或 MI-CS 与心力衰竭相关的 CS 或 HF-CS)评估了结果。

结果

在 6205 名患者中,有 754 名患者接受了 Impella 5.0/5.5(12.1%),其中 210 名 MI-CS(27.8%)和 484 名 HF-CS(64.1%)患者。Impella 5.0/5.5 作为唯一的 tMCS 装置在 32%的患者中使用,而 68%的患者接受了多种 tMCS 装置的联合治疗。Impella 插管部位可用于 524/754(69.4%)的患者,其中 93.5%为腋部配置。接受 Impella 5.0/5.5 支持的患者出院生存率为 67%,20.4%的患者实现了原生心脏恢复,45.5%的患者进行了心脏替代治疗。与 HF-CS 相比,接受 Impella 5.0/5.5 支持的 MI-CS 患者的院内死亡率更高(45.2% vs. 26.2%,p<0.001),接受心脏替代治疗的可能性更低(22.4% vs. 56.6%,p<0.001)。对于住院期间接受多种 tMCS 联合治疗的患者,与单独使用 Impella 5.0/5.5 相比,肢体缺血(9% vs. 3%,p<0.01)、出血(52% vs. 33%,p<0.01)和死亡率(38% vs. 25%,p<0.001)的发生率更高。在接受 Impella 5.0/5.5 的患者中,泵支持的中位时间为 12.9 天(IQR:6.8-22.9),桥接至心脏替代治疗的患者中位时间为 14 天(IQR:7.7-28.4)。

结论

在这项多中心 CS 患者队列研究中,使用 Impella 5.0/5.5 的总生存率为 67.1%,心脏替代治疗的比率较高。当 Impella 5.0/5.5 是唯一的支持装置时,不良事件发生率较低。需要进一步研究以确定早期使用 Impella 5.0/5.5 治疗 CS 是否能提高生存率。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.高容量 Impella 轴流泵支持下心源性休克患者的临床结局:心源性休克工作组的报告。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
2
Outcomes of Surgically Implanted Impella Microaxial Flow Pumps in Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭相关心源性休克中手术植入的Impella微轴流泵的治疗效果。
J Card Fail. 2025 Mar 30. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.03.008.
3
Clinical Outcomes Associated With Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Utilization in Heart Failure Related Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭相关性心原性休克应用急性机械循环支持的临床转归。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 May;14(5):e007924. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007924. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.在一家没有现场手术支持的农村社区医院,使用Impella进行血流动力学支持治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的结果。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Feb;31(2):E23-E29. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00252.
5
Inflammatory and Hemolytic Responses of Microaxial Flow Pump Temporary Ventricular Assist Devices via Axillary Access in Cardiogenic Shock.微轴流泵临时心室辅助装置经腋窝入路用于心源性休克时的炎症和溶血反应
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 28;60(12):1960. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121960.
6
Early vs. delayed mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的早期与延迟机械循环支持。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 May 28;13(5):390-397. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae034.
7
Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.Impella 5.0 和 5.5 系统用于机械循环支持的心源性休克患者的设备概况:安全性和疗效概述。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022 Jan;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2015323. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Percutaneous Right Ventricular Assist Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克中临时经皮右心室辅助装置的应用及结果
ASAIO J. 2025 May 1;71(5):379-386. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002348. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
9
The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.腋动脉置入Impella 5.0装置在急性心源性休克患者中的作用。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01251-7.
10
Three-year experience of catheter-based micro-axial left ventricular assist device, Impella, in Japanese patients: the first interim analysis of Japan registry for percutaneous ventricular assist device (J-PVAD).日本患者使用基于导管的微轴左心室辅助装置Impella的三年经验:日本经皮心室辅助装置注册研究(J-PVAD)的首次中期分析
J Artif Organs. 2023 Mar;26(1):17-23. doi: 10.1007/s10047-022-01328-1. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A Canadian Experience With a Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device in Children With Cardiogenic Shock.加拿大使用经皮微轴心室辅助装置治疗儿童心源性休克的经验。
CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2025 Feb 6;4(3):160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2025.01.004. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Sex Differences in Non-Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the Northwell-Shock Registry.非急性心肌梗死心源性休克中的性别差异:来自诺斯韦尔休克登记处的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 16;14(12):4274. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124274.
3
Patient-specific Predictors of Haemolysis with Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices.
经皮心室辅助装置溶血的患者特异性预测因素
Card Fail Rev. 2025 Feb 19;11:e04. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2024.30. eCollection 2025.
4
Implantation of a temporary microaxial left ventricular assist device via the right axillary artery in a patient with aberrant right subclavian artery.在一名右锁骨下动脉异常的患者中,经右腋动脉植入临时微轴左心室辅助装置。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Feb 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf011.
5
Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial.微轴流泵在梗死相关心源性休克中的应用及肾脏结局:DanGer休克试验的二次分析
Circulation. 2024 Dec 17;150(25):1990-2003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072370. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
6
Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies.心源性休克管理进展综述:从急救方案到长期治疗策略
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4841. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164841.