*Alberta Health Services,Departments of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Services,University of Calgary,Calgary, AB.
†Department of Emergency Medicine,Kingston Health Sciences Centre,Queen's University,Kingston, ON.
CJEM. 2019 Mar;21(2):177-185. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.446. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
Emergency department (ED) access block, the inability to provide timely care for high acuity patients, is the leading safety concern in First World EDs. The main cause of ED access block is hospital access block with prolonged boarding of inpatients in emergency stretchers. Cumulative emergency access gap, the product of the number of arriving high acuity patients and their average delay to reach a care space, is a novel access measure that provides a facility-level estimate of total emergency care delays. Many health leaders believe these delays are too large to be solved without substantial increases in hospital capacity. Our objective was to quantify cumulative emergency access blocks (the problem) as a fraction of inpatient capacity (the potential solution) at a large sample of Canadian hospitals.
In this cross-sectional study, we collated 2015 administrative data from 25 Canadian hospitals summarizing patient inflow and delays to ED care space. Cumulative access gap for high acuity patients was calculated by multiplying the number of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) 1-3 patients by their average delay to reach a care space. We compared cumulative ED access gap to available inpatient bed hours to estimate fractional access gap.
Study sites included 16 tertiary and 9 community EDs in 12 cities, representing 1.79 million patient visits. Median ED census (interquartile range) was 66,300 visits per year (58,700-80,600). High acuity patients accounted for 70.7% of visits (60.9%-79.0%). The mean (SD) cumulative ED access gap was 46,000 stretcher hours per site per year (± 19,900), which was 1.14% (± 0.45%) of inpatient capacity.
ED access gaps are large and jeopardize care for high acuity patients, but they are small relative to hospital operating capacity. If access block were viewed as a "whole hospital" problem, capacity or efficiency improvements in the range of 1% to 3% could profoundly mitigate emergency care delays.
在第一世界的急诊部(ED)中,无法及时为高急症患者提供治疗的 ED 接诊阻塞是主要的安全隐患。ED 接诊阻塞的主要原因是医院接诊阻塞,导致急症担架上的住院患者滞留时间延长。累计急诊接诊间隙是到达高急症患者数量与其到达治疗空间的平均延迟时间的乘积,是一种新的接诊衡量标准,可提供对总急诊护理延迟的设施级估计。许多卫生领导人认为,如果不大量增加医院容量,这些延迟时间过长,无法解决。我们的目的是在大量加拿大医院的样本中,将累计急诊接诊间隙(问题)量化为住院容量的一部分(潜在解决方案)。
在这项横断面研究中,我们整理了来自 25 家加拿大医院的 2015 年行政数据,这些数据总结了患者流入和到达 ED 治疗空间的延迟情况。通过将加拿大分诊 acuity 量表(CTAS)1-3 级患者的数量乘以他们到达治疗空间的平均延迟时间,计算出高急症患者的累计接诊间隙。我们将累计 ED 接诊间隙与可用住院床时数进行比较,以估计接诊间隙分数。
研究地点包括 12 个城市的 16 家三级和 9 家社区 ED,代表了 179 万例患者就诊。ED 患者人数中位数(四分位间距)为每年 66300 人次(58700-80600)。高急症患者占就诊人数的 70.7%(60.9%-79.0%)。平均(标准差)累计 ED 接诊间隙为每年每个站点 46000 张担架小时数(±19900),占住院容量的 1.14%(±0.45%)。
ED 接诊间隙很大,危及高急症患者的治疗,但相对于医院运营能力来说很小。如果将接诊阻塞视为“整个医院”的问题,那么在 1%到 3%的范围内提高容量或效率可以显著减轻急诊护理延迟。