Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1503-1511. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.08.036. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is numerically the most important risk factor for stroke. It is well established that patients with AF have a 5-fold increased risk of stroke relative to those without and that anticoagulation reduces the risk of stroke by approximately two-thirds. Definitively attributing the mechanism of an individual stroke to AF is more problematic, however. In fact, there is no way to reliably establish the etiology of any ischemic infarction. This necessitates screening for all potential stroke risk factors and treating accordingly. The pattern of infarction is often used to classify the presumed mechanism of infarction as thrombotic or embolic, although even this is approach is based on association and increasingly is recognized as not completely reliable. Furthermore, it should not dictate management-patients with perforating arterial territory infarcts with AF also require and benefit from anticoagulation. Likewise, if other potential embolic sources beyond AF are identified, anticoagulation remains the standard of care. The traditional conceptual model of the mechanistic link between AF and cardioembolic infarction is likely oversimplified. Long-term cardiac rhythm recording studies indicate an inconsistent temporal relationship between AF and infarction. This suggests that cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF may result from the underlying atrial cardiopathy, rather than the rhythm disturbance leading to atrial stasis and thromboembolism. We reviewed traditional and current concepts, as well as evidence for the role of AF in ischemic stroke.
心房颤动(AF)是数量上最重要的中风危险因素。已有充分证据表明,AF 患者中风的风险比无 AF 患者增加 5 倍,抗凝治疗可使中风风险降低约三分之二。然而,明确将个体中风的机制归因于 AF 更成问题。实际上,无法可靠确定任何缺血性梗死的病因。因此,需要筛查所有潜在的中风危险因素并进行相应治疗。梗死模式通常用于将假定的梗死机制分类为血栓形成或栓塞,尽管即使这种方法基于关联,并且越来越被认为不完全可靠。此外,它不应决定管理 - 有 AF 的穿透性动脉区域梗死的患者也需要并且受益于抗凝治疗。同样,如果确定了 AF 以外的其他潜在栓塞源,则抗凝治疗仍然是标准护理。AF 与心源性栓塞性梗死之间的机械联系的传统概念模型可能过于简单。长期心脏节律记录研究表明,AF 与梗死之间存在不一致的时间关系。这表明 AF 患者的心源性卒中可能是由潜在的心房心脏病引起的,而不是导致心房停滞和血栓栓塞的节律紊乱。我们回顾了传统和当前的概念,以及 AF 在缺血性中风中的作用的证据。