Ashiru-Oredope Diane, Doble Anne, Akpan Mary Richard, Hansraj Sejal, Shebl Nada Atef, Ahmad Raheelah, Hopkins Susan
HCAI & AMR Division, Public Health England, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2018 Nov 7;7(4):97. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics7040097.
The aim of this study was to assess antimicrobial stewardship activities in Community Healthcare Organisations (CHOs) with focus on the implementation of the two national antimicrobial stewardship toolkits, TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, Education, Tools) and SSTF (Start Smart, then Focus). The study utilised a web-based survey comprising 34 questions concerning antimicrobial policies and awareness and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship toolkits. This was distributed to pharmacy teams in all 26 CHOs in England. Twenty CHOs (77%) responded. An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) committee was active in 50% of CHOs; 25% employed a substantive pharmacist post and 70% had a local antibiotic policy. Fourteen of the responding CHOs were aware of both AMS toolkits, five organisations were aware of either SSTF or TARGET, and one organisation was not aware of either toolkit. Of the organisations aware of SSTF and TARGET, eight had formally reviewed both toolkits, though three had not reviewed either. Less than half of the respondents had developed local action plans for either toolkit. National guidance in England has focused attention on initiatives to improve AMS implementation in primary and secondary care; more work is required to embed AMS activities and the implementation of national AMS toolkit recommendations within CHOs.
本研究的目的是评估社区医疗机构(CHO)中的抗菌药物管理活动,重点是两个国家抗菌药物管理工具包的实施情况,即“负责任地使用抗生素,指导、教育、工具”(TARGET)和“明智起步,然后聚焦”(SSTF)。该研究采用了一项基于网络的调查,其中包含34个关于抗菌药物政策以及抗菌药物管理工具包的知晓度和实施情况的问题。该调查已分发给英格兰所有26家CHO的药房团队。20家CHO(77%)做出了回应。50%的CHO设有活跃的抗菌药物管理(AMS)委员会;25%聘用了专职药剂师岗位,70%有当地的抗生素政策。14家做出回应的CHO知晓这两个AMS工具包,5家机构知晓SSTF或TARGET其中之一,1家机构对这两个工具包均不知情。在知晓SSTF和TARGET的机构中,8家对这两个工具包都进行了正式审查,不过有3家对任何一个都未进行审查。不到一半的受访者针对其中任何一个工具包制定了当地行动计划。英格兰的国家指南已将注意力集中在改善初级和二级医疗中AMS实施的举措上;还需要开展更多工作,以将AMS活动以及国家AMS工具包建议的实施纳入CHO。