Devos Hannes, Ranchet Maud, Bollinger Kathryn, Conn Amber, Akinwuntan Abiodun E
a Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Health Professions , The University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City , Kansas.
b Univ Lyon, IFSTTAR , Lyon , France.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):715-721. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1508834. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
Conventional visual field (VF) tests are limited in predicting on-road driving performance of individuals with glaucoma. We developed a new performance-based VF test in a driving simulator for individuals with glaucoma. The aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed test.
In this pilot study, 17 drivers with glaucoma aged 65.24 ± 9.69 and 13 control drivers aged 61.27 ± 11.45 completed the performance-based VF task. Construct validity was determined by comparing performance on the new task with results on conventional visual and perimetry tests including Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, Keystone Vision Screener, and Useful Field of View (UFOV). Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing performance on the new task with on-road driving performance, scored using the Test Ride for Investigating Practical fitness-to-drive (TRIP). Ten individuals (7 with glaucoma and 3 controls) participated in the test-retest reliability assessment.
Drivers with glaucoma identified fewer symbols (P = .047) and took longer to respond to the symbols (P = .048) compared to controls. In the glaucoma group, correct responses on the performance-based VF test correlated strongly (r = -0.51, P = .046) with UFOV divided attention. Both glaucoma and control groups achieved submaximal to maximal scores on the TRIP (median [Q1-Q3], glaucoma: 193 [191-196]; controls: 196 [195-196]; P = .16). No strong correlations were found between scores on the performance-based VF test and on-road driving performance in glaucoma. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.77 for response time and 0.92 for correct responses, indicating good to excellent test-retest reliability.
We established the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the performance-based VF test. Future studies should include a larger sample with more severe driving difficulties to demonstrate the concurrent validity between performance-based VF testing and on-road driving performance in glaucoma.
传统视野(VF)测试在预测青光眼患者的道路驾驶性能方面存在局限性。我们在驾驶模拟器中为青光眼患者开发了一种新的基于性能的VF测试。目的是评估新开发测试的心理测量特性。
在这项初步研究中,17名年龄为65.24±9.69岁的青光眼驾驶员和13名年龄为61.27±11.45岁的对照驾驶员完成了基于性能的VF任务。通过将新任务的表现与包括汉弗莱视野分析仪、基石视觉筛查仪和有用视野(UFOV)在内的传统视觉和视野测试结果进行比较来确定结构效度。通过将新任务的表现与道路驾驶性能进行比较来评估同时效度,道路驾驶性能使用调查实际驾驶适应性的试驾(TRIP)进行评分。10名个体(7名青光眼患者和3名对照者)参与了重测信度评估。
与对照组相比,青光眼驾驶员识别的符号更少(P = 0.047),对符号做出反应的时间更长(P = 0.048)。在青光眼组中,基于性能的VF测试的正确反应与UFOV注意力分散密切相关(r = -0.51,P = 0.046)。青光眼组和对照组在TRIP上均获得了次最大到最大分数(中位数[四分位数间距],青光眼组:193[191 - 196];对照组:196[195 - 196];P = 0.16)。在青光眼患者中,基于性能的VF测试分数与道路驾驶性能之间未发现强相关性。组内相关系数在反应时间为0.77和正确反应为0.92之间,表明重测信度良好到优秀。
我们确立了基于性能的VF测试的结构效度和重测信度。未来的研究应纳入更大样本且驾驶困难更严重的患者,以证明基于性能的VF测试与青光眼患者道路驾驶性能之间的同时效度。