• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产房里的第二受害者:丹麦的助产士和产科医生是否得到了他们所需的支持?

Second victims in the labor ward: Are Danish midwives and obstetricians getting the support they need?

机构信息

Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Research Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Oct 31;31(8):583-589. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy219.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzy219
PMID:30407515
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe midwives' and obstetricians' experiences on the level of support from colleagues and managers in Danish labor wards following adverse events.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A 2012 National survey of Danish obstetricians and midwives was conducted to assess the level of support received in the workplace.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Scales on social community at work, social support from colleagues and immediate superiors, and use of support mechanisms on labor wards after serious adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

2098 midwives and obstetricians were invited to complete the survey (response rate 59%), and the analyses were carried out on the 593 respondents who had been involved in at least one traumatic childbirth at their current place of work. Respondents experienced high levels of social support from colleagues and social community at work, midwives significantly higher than obstetricians, and 95% of respondents had talked to colleagues about an adverse event. Respondents generally experienced low levels of social support and feedback from immediate superiors, and only 49% had talked to their immediate superior about an adverse event. Fifty% believed that the hospital had a clear process through which they could report adverse events, and 44% knew how to access the necessary confidential emotional support at work.

CONCLUSIONS

Midwives and obstetricians experienced high levels of social support and feedback from colleagues who are the most frequent individuals to consult after adverse events. We strongly suggest developing second victim support programmes with a focus on offering peer support from qualified and trained peers.

摘要

目的

描述丹麦产房助产士和产科医生在经历不良事件后,从同事和管理人员那里获得支持的程度。

设计、地点和参与者:2012 年对丹麦产科医生和助产士进行了一项全国性调查,以评估他们在工作场所获得的支持程度。

主要结果衡量指标

评估了工作场所中的社会社区、同事和直接上级的社会支持以及在严重不良事件后使用支持机制的情况。

结果

共邀请了 2098 名助产士和产科医生参加调查(回应率为 59%),对在当前工作场所经历过至少一次创伤性分娩的 593 名受访者进行了分析。受访者经历了来自同事的高度社会支持和工作中的社会社区,助产士明显高于产科医生,95%的受访者曾就不良事件与同事交谈过。受访者普遍经历来自直接上级的低水平社会支持和反馈,只有 49%的受访者曾就不良事件与直接上级交谈过。50%的人认为医院有一个明确的报告不良事件的流程,44%的人知道如何在工作中获得必要的保密情感支持。

结论

助产士和产科医生经历了来自同事的高水平社会支持和反馈,他们是在不良事件后最常咨询的人。我们强烈建议制定第二受害者支持计划,重点是提供由合格和培训有素的同行提供的同行支持。

相似文献

1
Second victims in the labor ward: Are Danish midwives and obstetricians getting the support they need?产房里的第二受害者:丹麦的助产士和产科医生是否得到了他们所需的支持?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Oct 31;31(8):583-589. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy219.
2
Psychosocial health and well-being among obstetricians and midwives involved in traumatic childbirth.经历创伤性分娩的产科医生和助产士的心理社会健康与幸福状况。
Midwifery. 2016 Oct;41:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
3
Self-reported exposure to severe events on the labour ward among Swedish midwives and obstetricians: A cross-sectional retrospective study.瑞典助产士和产科医生自述在产房暴露于严重事件的情况:一项横断面回顾性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jan;65:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
4
Left alone with the emotional surge - A qualitative study of midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of severe events on the labour ward.独自面对情感冲击——助产士和产科医生在产房经历严重事件的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020 Mar;23:100483. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.100483. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
5
Traumatic Experiences and the Midwifery Profession: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Dutch Midwives.创伤经历与助产士职业:荷兰助产士的横断面研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Jul;64(4):435-442. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12946. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
6
Post-traumatic stress symptoms in Swedish obstetricians and midwives after severe obstetric events: a cross-sectional retrospective survey.创伤后应激症状在瑞典产科医生和助产士在严重产科事件后:横断面回顾性调查。
BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1264-1271. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14259. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
7
Reliability and validity of Midwifery - Obstetrics Collaboration (MOC) scale: A tool to improve collaborative practice.助产-产科协作(MOC)量表的信度和效度:一种改善协作实践的工具。
Midwifery. 2021 May;96:102941. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102941. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
Blame and guilt - a mixed methods study of obstetricians' and midwives' experiences and existential considerations after involvement in traumatic childbirth.指责与内疚——一项关于产科医生和助产士经历创伤性分娩后的体验及存在主义思考的混合方法研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jul;95(7):735-45. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12897. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
9
Midwives' and obstetricians' views on appropriate obstetric sonography in Norway.挪威助产士和产科医生对适当产科超声检查的看法。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
10
Work-related adverse events leaving their mark: a cross-sectional study among Dutch gynecologists.工作相关不良事件留下痕迹:荷兰妇科医生的横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 22;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1659-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The second victim phenomenon among midwives in Austria (SeViD-A3): A cross-sectional study.奥地利助产士中的二次受害者现象(SeViD-A3):一项横断面研究。
Eur J Midwifery. 2025 Jul 16;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/206922. eCollection 2025.
2
Maternity care providers' experiences of work-related serious events (MATES): An International survey.产科护理人员与工作相关严重事件的经历(MATES):一项国际调查。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 14;20(2):e0317682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317682. eCollection 2025.
3
In search of an international multidimensional action plan for second victim support: a narrative review.
探寻国际多维度第二受害者支持行动计划:叙事性综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09637-8.
4
The Effect of Second-Victim-Related Distress and Support on Work-Related Outcomes in Tertiary Care Hospitals in Kelantan, Malaysia.马来西亚吉兰丹州三级医院中与第二受害者相关的困扰和支持对工作相关结果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 26;19(11):6454. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116454.
5
Feelings of being a second victim among Spanish midwives and obstetricians.西班牙助产士和产科医生的二次伤害感受。
Nurs Open. 2022 Sep;9(5):2356-2369. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1249. Epub 2022 May 28.
6
Evaluation of'the Buddy Study', a peer support program for second victims in healthcare: a survey in two Danish hospital departments.评估“伙伴研究”,一个医疗保健中第二受害者的同伴支持计划:在丹麦两个医院科室的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07973-9.
7
Prevalence of adverse events and their manifestations in health professionals as second victims.医护人员作为“二次受害者”时不良事件及其表现的发生率
Biomedica. 2022 Mar 1;42(1):184-195. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.6169.
8
Translation and Validation of the Malay Revised Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (M-SVEST-R) among Healthcare Workers in Kelantan, Malaysia.马来西亚吉兰丹医护人员的马来修订版第二受害者体验与支持工具(M-SVEST-R)的翻译与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2045. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042045.