Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH, USA.
Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2019 Apr;111(2):202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
The aim of this study was to provide a contemporary analysis of longitudinal kidney transplant outcomes and to evaluate potential causes of ethnic disparities among African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) patients undergoing kidney transplantation at our institution.
1400 patients were identified who underwent kidney transplantation from 2003 to 2013 from a large, academic institution in Cleveland, OH. Relevant recipient and donor demographic and clinical covariates were obtained from an institutional transplant database. Simple descriptive statistics and comparative survival analyses were performed to assess overall survival and graft survival.
The final cohort was comprised of 341 AA and 1059 CA patients. AAs were less likely to receive a living donor transplant (27.6% vs. 57.2%, p < 0.001) compared to CAs. Overall patient survival did not significantly differ between the two groups even when stratified by ethnicity. However, AAs had a significantly lower rate of graft survival (p < 0.001). On stratified analysis, there was no difference in the rate of graft survival among AAs and CAs who received living donor grafts. On univariate analysis, AAs demonstrated higher rates of immunosuppression non-compliance and chronic rejection (both p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, AA recipient ethnicity (HR 1.56, p = 0.047), recipient history of diabetes (HR 1.67, p < 0.001), and AA donor ethnicity (HR 1.56, p = 0.047) were significantly associated with graft failure.
AAs undergoing deceased donor renal transplantation demonstrated lower graft survival compared to CAs. Conversely, this disparity did not exist among AAs undergoing living donor transplantation. AAs had higher rates of deceased donor transplantation, immunosuppression non-compliance, chronic rejection, and diabetes. Opportunities exist to use patient education, alternative immunosuppression regimens, and living transplantation to close the ethnic disparity in renal allograft survival.
本研究旨在提供对纵向肾脏移植结果的当代分析,并评估在我们机构接受肾脏移植的非裔美国人和白种人患者之间种族差异的潜在原因。
从俄亥俄州克利夫兰市的一家大型学术机构确定了 1400 名于 2003 年至 2013 年期间接受肾脏移植的患者。从机构移植数据库中获得了相关的受体和供体人口统计学和临床协变量。简单描述性统计和比较生存分析用于评估总生存率和移植物生存率。
最终队列由 341 名非裔美国人(AAs)和 1059 名白种人(CAs)组成。与 CAs 相比,AAs 接受活体供体移植的可能性较小(27.6%对 57.2%,p<0.001)。即使按种族分层,两组之间的总体患者生存率也没有显着差异。然而,AAs 的移植物存活率明显较低(p<0.001)。在分层分析中,接受活体供体移植物的 AAs 和 CAs 之间的移植物存活率没有差异。在单变量分析中,AAs 表现出更高的免疫抑制不依从率和慢性排斥反应(均 p<0.05)。在多变量分析中,AA 受体种族(HR 1.56,p=0.047)、受体糖尿病史(HR 1.67,p<0.001)和 AA 供体种族(HR 1.56,p=0.047)与移植物失败显着相关。
与 CAs 相比,接受已故供体肾移植的 AAs 表现出较低的移植物存活率。相反,在接受活体供体移植的 AAs 中,这种差异并不存在。AAs 接受过更多的已故供体移植、免疫抑制不依从、慢性排斥和糖尿病。可以利用患者教育、替代免疫抑制方案和活体移植来缩小肾移植同种异体移植物存活率的种族差异。