Marengo Lorenza, Nasto Luigi Aurelio, Michelis Maria Beatrice, Boero Silvio
Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, via Gerolamo Gaslini 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy.
Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, via Gerolamo Gaslini 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy.
Injury. 2018 Nov;49 Suppl 3:S8-S11. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.049.
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is currently considered the gold standard in surgical treatment of femur and tibial shaft fractures in school age paediatric patients. Although elastic intramedullary nails are available in both titanium (Ti) and stainless steel (SS) alloy, titanium nails are most commonly used. Nevertheless, there is still contrasting evidence as to whether the use of Ti nails can offer better outcomes in terms of fracture healing and stability over SS nails. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complications of Ti and SS ESIN for femur and tibia shaft fractures in a population of school age paediatric patients.
All consecutive patients who underwent ESIN for femoral or tibial shaft fracture from June 2012 to May 2015 at our centre were retrospectively reviewed. Standard demographic data were collected. Pre-operative and post-operative X-rays were reviewed, complications were collected from patients charts. Patients were divided in two groups, titanium nails (Ti group) and stainless steel nails (SS group) and outcomes compared between the two.
A total of 34 patients were included (17 patients Ti group, 17 patients SS group) with a total of 14 femur and 21 tibia fractures. Average age at surgery was 9.4 ± 2.5 years in Ti group and 10.4 ± 2.4 years in SS group (p = 0.21). The average time to bone healing was 3 months in Ti group, and 2.8 months in SS group (p = 0.63). At final follow-up (12 months), no patient showed a coronal plane or sagittal plane deformity >10° and >15°, respectively. Complication rate was similar between the two groups (24% Ti group, 22% SS group).
We did not observe any significant difference in terms of bone healing, fracture mechanical stability, return to full activity, and complication rate between Ti and SS ESIN for paediatric femoral and tibial shaft fractures. While Ti nails remain a better choice for patients with metal allergy, SS nails may offer safe, effective, and cheaper alternative to Ti nails in school age femur and tibial shaft fractures.
弹性稳定髓内钉(ESIN)目前被认为是学龄期儿童股骨干和胫骨干骨折手术治疗的金标准。尽管弹性髓内钉有钛(Ti)合金和不锈钢(SS)合金两种材质,但钛钉是最常用的。然而,关于在骨折愈合和稳定性方面,使用钛钉是否比不锈钢钉能带来更好的治疗效果,仍存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究的目的是比较学龄期儿童股骨干和胫骨干骨折使用钛钉和不锈钢钉进行弹性稳定髓内钉固定术的治疗效果和并发症情况。
对2012年6月至2015年5月在本中心接受股骨干或胫骨干骨折弹性稳定髓内钉固定术的所有连续患者进行回顾性研究。收集标准人口统计学数据。复查术前和术后X线片,从患者病历中收集并发症情况。将患者分为两组,钛钉组(Ti组)和不锈钢钉组(SS组),并比较两组的治疗效果。
共纳入34例患者(Ti组17例,SS组17例),其中股骨干骨折14例,胫骨干骨折21例。Ti组手术平均年龄为9.4±2.5岁,SS组为10.4±2.4岁(p = 0.21)。Ti组平均骨愈合时间为3个月,SS组为2.8个月(p = 0.63)。在末次随访(12个月)时,没有患者在冠状面或矢状面的畸形分别超过10°和15°。两组并发症发生率相似(Ti组24%,SS组22%)。
对于儿童股骨干和胫骨干骨折,我们未观察到钛钉和不锈钢钉弹性稳定髓内钉固定术在骨愈合、骨折力学稳定性、恢复完全活动能力以及并发症发生率方面存在任何显著差异。虽然钛钉对于金属过敏患者仍是更好的选择,但在学龄期股骨干和胫骨干骨折中,不锈钢钉可能为钛钉提供安全、有效且更便宜的替代方案。