• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助化疗治疗强度对卵巢癌预后的影响。

Prognostic impact of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment intensity for ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo NY, United States of America.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206913. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0206913
PMID:30418985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6231633/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of duration of first-line chemotherapy administration in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Chemotherapy records were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Patients with on-time completion (105 days) were compared to patients finishing early (<105 days), delays of 1-4 weeks, or >4 weeks. For 222 women with stage IIIC/IV, stage-stratified estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. A delay sub-study was performed with outliers removed. Each week of delay was correlated with the change in PFS and OS to identify time points associated with change in outcome.

RESULTS

Most women had on-time completion of chemotherapy (23.6%) or a treatment delay of ≤4 weeks (21.8%); 21.6% of women experienced a delay longer than 4 weeks. R0 resection at initial debulking (OR = 1.99, 95%CI: 1.18-3.36, p = 0.010) and RECIST complete response (OR = 4.88, 95%CI: 2.47-10.63, p<0.001) were strongly associated with on-time completion. Patients with on-time completion and < 1 month delay had similar median survivals of 43.1 months (lower 95% CI bound 33.7 months) and 44.5 months (lower bound 37.0, p = 0.93). Women with >1 month delay had decreased median survival of 18.1 months (14.7-24.9 months), while women with short intervals survived 35.0 months (95%CI: 21.8-49.8 months). Short-term delays lead to progressively decreasing OS. This was significantly different from the on-schedule survival estimate after 6 weeks of delay.

CONCLUSIONS

On-time completion of chemotherapy correlates with increased survival and higher complete response rates. Increasing delays in chemotherapy completion were associated with decreased survival.

摘要

目的

我们旨在研究上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者一线化疗给药时间的长短对预后的影响。

方法

从电子病历中提取化疗记录。将按时完成(<105 天)的患者与提前完成(<105 天)、延迟 1-4 周和>4 周的患者进行比较。对于 222 名 IIIC/IV 期患者,对无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行分层估计。对延迟亚研究进行了离群值剔除。比较每延迟一周与 PFS 和 OS 的变化,以确定与结果变化相关的时间点。

结果

大多数女性按时完成化疗(23.6%)或延迟治疗≤4 周(21.8%);21.6%的女性延迟时间超过 4 周。初次减瘤术时达到 R0 切除(OR=1.99,95%CI:1.18-3.36,p=0.010)和 RECIST 完全缓解(OR=4.88,95%CI:2.47-10.63,p<0.001)与按时完成治疗呈强相关。按时完成治疗且延迟时间<1 个月的患者中位生存期相似,分别为 43.1 个月(下限 95%CI 为 33.7 个月)和 44.5 个月(下限 37.0,p=0.93)。延迟>1 个月的患者中位生存期为 18.1 个月(14.7-24.9 个月),而短时间延迟的患者中位生存期为 35.0 个月(95%CI:21.8-49.8 个月)。短期延迟导致 OS 逐渐下降。这与 6 周后按时完成化疗的生存估计有显著差异。

结论

按时完成化疗与生存增加和更高的完全缓解率相关。化疗完成时间的延迟增加与生存降低相关。

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment intensity for ovarian cancer.辅助化疗治疗强度对卵巢癌预后的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206913. eCollection 2018.
2
Impact of antibiotic treatment during platinum chemotherapy on survival and recurrence in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.铂类化疗期间使用抗生素治疗对晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者生存和复发的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
3
Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking surgery and survival in ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗至间隔减瘤手术的延迟时间与卵巢癌患者的生存关系。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Oct;30(10):1554-1561. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000989. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
Does adjuvant chemotherapy dose modification have an impact on the outcome of patients diagnosed with advanced stage ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.辅助化疗剂量调整是否会影响晚期卵巢癌患者的结局?一项 NRG 肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学组的研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Oct;151(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Aug 19.
5
Critical Analysis of Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients after Treatment with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC).新辅助化疗后细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS/HIPEC)治疗的 IV 期上皮性卵巢癌患者的批判性分析。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec 16;2020:1467403. doi: 10.1155/2020/1467403. eCollection 2020.
6
Final report on serial phase II trials of all-intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed, optimally cytoreduced carcinoma of Müllerian origin.新诊断为最佳减瘤的 Müllerian 来源上皮性卵巢癌患者采用或不采用贝伐珠单抗的全腹腔化疗的连续 II 期临床试验的最终报告。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 May;153(2):223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
7
Minimal residual disease at primary debulking surgery versus complete tumor resection at interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A survival analysis.在晚期上皮性卵巢癌中,初次肿瘤细胞减灭术时的微小残留病灶与间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术时的完全肿瘤切除相比:一项生存分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):209-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
8
Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (SCORPION-NCT01461850).随机试验原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术与新辅助化疗治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌(SCORPION-NCT01461850)。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1657-1664. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001640. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Carboplatin re-treatment in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer patients.卡铂再治疗铂耐药的上皮性卵巢癌患者。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;86(6):751-759. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04162-5. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
10
Interval between secondary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with survivals in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.二次细胞减灭术后至辅助化疗的间隔时间与复发性卵巢癌患者的生存无关。
J Ovarian Res. 2019 Dec 31;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0602-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement of Prognostic Outcome in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.I期上皮性卵巢癌微创手术预后结果的改善
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Feb 27;14(1):66-71. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_77_24. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
The impact of inter-cycle treatment delays on overall survival in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.治疗周期间的延迟对晚期卵巢癌患者总生存期的影响。
Oncologist. 2024 Nov 4;29(11):e1532-e1539. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae201.
3
Retrospective analysis of the impact of dose delay and reduction on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI‑based treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of ascites volume on clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer: A cohort study.腹水容量对卵巢癌临床结局的影响:一项队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):491-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
2
NY-ESO-1 expression predicts an aggressive phenotype of ovarian cancer.NY-ESO-1表达预示着卵巢癌的侵袭性表型。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jun;145(3):420-425. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.509. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
基于 FOLFIRI 方案治疗的结直肠癌患者,剂量延迟和减少对其结局影响的回顾性分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Sep 12;11:e15995. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15995. eCollection 2023.
4
Effect of Exercise on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Among Patients Treated for Ovarian Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.运动对卵巢癌化疗所致周围神经病的影响:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2326463. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26463.
5
Loss of MAGEC3 Expression Is Associated with Prognosis in Advanced Ovarian Cancers.MAGEC3表达缺失与晚期卵巢癌的预后相关。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 30;14(3):731. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030731.
6
What is Elective Oncologic Surgery in the Time of COVID-19? A Literature Review of the Impact of Surgical Delays on Outcomes in Patients with Cancer.2019冠状病毒病时期的择期肿瘤手术是什么?关于手术延迟对癌症患者预后影响的文献综述
Clin Oncol Res. 2020 Jun;3(6):1-11. doi: 10.31487/j.COR.2020.06.05. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
7
The natural compound n-butylidenephthalide kills high-grade serous ovarian cancer stem cells by activating intrinsic apoptosis signaling pathways.天然化合物正丁烯基苯酞通过激活内源性凋亡信号通路杀死高级别浆液性卵巢癌干细胞。
J Cancer. 2021 Mar 30;12(11):3126-3135. doi: 10.7150/jca.51650. eCollection 2021.
8
Rationalizing Treatment for Gynecological Cancers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Indian Experience.新冠疫情期间妇科癌症治疗的合理化:印度经验
Indian J Gynecol Oncol. 2020;18(3):101. doi: 10.1007/s40944-020-00448-x. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Chemotherapy delay after primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer.卵巢癌初次肿瘤细胞减灭术后的化疗延迟。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
5
Minimally invasive versus standard laparotomic interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm: A single-institution retrospective case-control study.卵巢肿瘤的微创与标准开腹间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术:一项单机构回顾性病例对照研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec;143(3):516-520. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
6
Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States.美国晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗的使用趋势
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov;143(2):236-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
7
Early initiation of chemotherapy following complete resection of advanced ovarian cancer associated with improved survival: NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.晚期卵巢癌完全切除术后早期开始化疗与生存改善相关:NRG肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学组研究
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):114-21. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv500. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
On representing the prognostic value of continuous gene expression biomarkers with the restricted mean survival curve.关于用受限平均生存曲线表示连续基因表达生物标志物的预后价值。
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 3;6(34):36308-18. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6121.
9
Laparoscopic Debulking Surgery in the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后腹腔镜肿瘤细胞减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Sep;25(7):1253-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000491.
10
Delay in chemotherapy administration impacts survival in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.化疗延迟会影响老年上皮性卵巢癌患者的生存。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jun;137(3):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.052. Epub 2015 Apr 1.