Department of Biomedical Science, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ.
Department of Pathology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Mar 1;151(4):371-376. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy152.
Traditional laboratory utilization measures are unable to detect the results of small-scale utilization improvement efforts in a background of rising patient volumes and acuity. However, accurate assessment is necessary to document effectiveness of these efforts.
Test menu changes, physician education, and laboratory utilization feedback were used to address costs and overused tests. Effectiveness was evaluated using cost/case mix index (CMI)-adjusted hospital day and inpatient tests/CMI-adjusted discharge. These metrics were compared with the more traditional measures of cost/test and inpatient tests/discharge.
Cost/CMI-adjusted hospital day and inpatient tests/CMI-adjusted discharge better demonstrated the impact of utilization improvement efforts compared with more traditional measures because they account for changes in patient volume and acuity.
Cost/CMI-adjusted hospital day and tests/CMI-adjusted discharge show the effectiveness of laboratory utilization efforts despite increasing patient volume and acuity.
在患者量和病情严重程度不断上升的背景下,传统的实验室利用指标无法检测到小规模利用改善措施的结果。然而,为了证明这些措施的有效性,准确的评估是必要的。
采用检验项目调整、医生教育和实验室利用反馈来解决成本和过度使用的检验问题。使用成本/病例组合指数(CMI)调整后的住院日和住院检验/CMI 调整后的出院来评估有效性。这些指标与成本/检验和住院检验/出院等更传统的指标进行了比较。
与更传统的指标相比,成本/CMI 调整后的住院日和住院检验/CMI 调整后的出院更好地说明了利用改善措施的影响,因为它们考虑了患者量和病情严重程度的变化。
尽管患者量和病情严重程度不断增加,但成本/CMI 调整后的住院日和检验/CMI 调整后的出院显示了实验室利用工作的有效性。