Suppr超能文献

在医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心肿瘤护理模式定义的治疗中,肿瘤学与非肿瘤学支出的比例。

Share of Oncology Versus Nononcology Spending in Episodes Defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Oncology Care Model.

机构信息

Precision Health Economics; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Emmaus, PA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2018 Nov;14(11):e699-e710. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00309.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Performance-based payments to oncology providers participating in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Oncology Care Model (OCM) are based, in part, on overall spending in 6-month episodes of care, including spending unrelated to oncology care. The amount of spending likely to occur outside of oncologists' purview is unknown.

METHODS

Following the OCM definition of an episode, we used SEER-Medicare data from 2006 to 2013 to identify episodes of cancer care for the following diagnoses: breast cancer (BC), non-small-cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, multiple myeloma (MM), and chronic myeloid leukemia. Claims were categorized by service type and, separately, whether the content fell within the purview of oncology providers (classified as oncology, with all other claims nononcology). We calculated the shares of episode spending attributable to oncology versus nononcology services.

RESULTS

The percentage of oncology spending within OCM episodes ranged from 62.4% in BC to 85.5% in MM. The largest source of oncology spending was antineoplastic drug therapy, ranging from 21.8% of total episode spending in BC to 67.6% in chronic myeloid leukemia. The largest source of nononcology spending was acute hospitalization and inpatient physician costs, ranging from 6.6% of overall spending for MM to 10.4% for non-small-cell lung cancer; inpatient oncology spending contributed roughly similar shares to overall spending.

CONCLUSION

Most spending in OCM-defined episodes was attributable to services related to cancer care, especially antineoplastic drug therapy. Inability to control nononcology spending may present challenges for practices participating in the OCM, however.

摘要

目的

参与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)肿瘤护理模式(OCM)的肿瘤学提供者的基于绩效的支付部分基于 6 个月护理期的总支出,包括与肿瘤学护理无关的支出。超出肿瘤学家范围的支出金额尚不清楚。

方法

根据 OCM 对病例的定义,我们使用 2006 年至 2013 年 SEER-Medicare 数据来确定以下诊断的癌症护理病例:乳腺癌(BC)、非小细胞肺癌、肾细胞癌、多发性骨髓瘤(MM)和慢性髓性白血病。索赔按服务类型分类,分别按是否属于肿瘤学提供者的范围(归类为肿瘤学,所有其他索赔为非肿瘤学)。我们计算了病例支出归因于肿瘤学与非肿瘤学服务的份额。

结果

OCM 病例中肿瘤学支出的百分比范围从 BC 的 62.4%到 MM 的 85.5%。肿瘤学支出的最大来源是抗肿瘤药物治疗,从 BC 总病例支出的 21.8%到慢性髓性白血病的 67.6%不等。非肿瘤学支出的最大来源是急性住院和住院医生费用,从 MM 的总支出的 6.6%到非小细胞肺癌的 10.4%不等;住院肿瘤学支出对总支出的贡献大致相同。

结论

OCM 定义的病例中大部分支出归因于与癌症护理相关的服务,尤其是抗肿瘤药物治疗。然而,对于参与 OCM 的实践来说,无法控制非肿瘤学支出可能会带来挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验