Lee Jang Ho, Park Yu Rang, Kweon Solbi, Kim Seulgi, Ji Wonjun, Choi Chang-Min
Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biomedical System Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 14;6(11):e12048. doi: 10.2196/12048.
During intrahospital transport, adverse events are inevitable. Real-time monitoring can be helpful for preventing these events during intrahospital transport.
We attempted to determine the viability of risk signal detection using wearable devices and mobile apps during intrahospital transport. An alarm was sent to clinicians in the event of oxygen saturation below 90%, heart rate above 140 or below 60 beats per minute (bpm), and network errors. We validated the reliability of the risk signal transmitted over the network.
We used two wearable devices to monitor oxygen saturation and heart rate for 23 patients during intrahospital transport for diagnostic workup or rehabilitation. To determine the agreement between the devices, records collected every 4 seconds were matched and imputation was performed if no records were collected at the same time by both devices. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to evaluate the relationships between the two devices.
Data for 21 patients were delivered to the cloud over LTE, and data for two patients were delivered over Wi-Fi. Monitoring devices were used for 20 patients during intrahospital transport for diagnostic work up and for three patients during rehabilitation. Three patients using supplemental oxygen before the study were included. In our study, the ICC for the heart rate between the two devices was 0.940 (95% CI 0.939-0.942) and that of oxygen saturation was 0.719 (95% CI 0.711-0.727). Systemic error analyzed with Bland-Altman analysis was 0.428 for heart rate and -1.404 for oxygen saturation. During the study, 14 patients had 20 risk signals: nine signals for eight patients with less than 90% oxygen saturation, four for four patients with a heart rate of 60 bpm or less, and seven for five patients due to network error.
We developed a system that notifies the health care provider of the risk level of a patient during transportation using a wearable device and a mobile app. Although there were some problems such as missing values and network errors, this paper is meaningful in that the previously mentioned risk detection system was validated with actual patients.
在院内转运期间,不良事件不可避免。实时监测有助于预防院内转运期间的这些事件。
我们试图确定在院内转运期间使用可穿戴设备和移动应用程序进行风险信号检测的可行性。在血氧饱和度低于90%、心率高于140次/分钟或低于60次/分钟以及出现网络错误时,会向临床医生发送警报。我们验证了通过网络传输的风险信号的可靠性。
我们使用两台可穿戴设备在23例患者院内转运进行诊断检查或康复期间监测血氧饱和度和心率。为了确定设备之间的一致性,对每4秒收集的记录进行匹配,如果两台设备没有同时收集到记录,则进行插补。我们使用组内相关系数(ICC)来评估两台设备之间的关系。
21例患者的数据通过LTE传输到云端,2例患者的数据通过Wi-Fi传输。在20例患者院内转运进行诊断检查期间使用了监测设备,3例患者在康复期间使用。包括3例在研究前使用补充氧气的患者。在我们的研究中,两台设备之间心率的ICC为0.940(95%CI 0.939 - 0.942),血氧饱和度的ICC为0.719(95%CI 0.711 - 0.727)。通过Bland-Altman分析得出的心率系统误差为0.428,血氧饱和度为 -1.404。在研究期间,14例患者出现20次风险信号:8例血氧饱和度低于90%的患者出现9次信号,4例心率为60次/分钟或更低的患者出现4次信号,5例患者因网络错误出现7次信号。
我们开发了一种系统,该系统使用可穿戴设备和移动应用程序在转运期间向医疗保健提供者通知患者的风险水平。尽管存在一些问题,如缺失值和网络错误,但本文的意义在于上述风险检测系统已在实际患者中得到验证。