Samra Tanvir, Deepak R, Jayant Aveek, Saini Vikas
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):584-592. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_686_17.
Limitation in use of pulse pressure variation (PPV) in predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in hypotensive patients is encountered when values are in the "gray zone" (8-13%). Dynamic arterial elastance ( = PPV/SVV) can be used in such situations to predict arterial pressure response to volume expansion (VE). In our study, we used respiratory variation of ascending aorta velocity time integral (AoVTI) calculated from suprasternal window as a surrogate of stroke volume variation (SVV). Fluids/vasopressors were administered to hypotensive patients intraoperatively based on value of . Aim was to assess feasibility and utility of suprasternal echocardiography in the above-mentioned subset of patients.
Hemodynamic data were monitored and respiratory variation in AoVTI was recorded using suprasternal echocardiography at all time points when patients developed hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg/<20% of baseline for 5 min) and at randomly selected time intervals when hemodynamic stability was maintained. VE with 250 ml of Ringer lactate (RL) was done in hypotensive patients with PPV value of 8-13% and >0.9. Increase of >15% in AoVTI after VE defined "fluid responsiveness."
Twenty-eight patients were enrolled, but three were excluded in view of left ventricular systolic dysfunction detected during preinduction echocardiography. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were recorded at 538 observation points in 25 adults. Hypotension occurred in 247 data sets, and in 168 data sets, value of PPV was 8-13%. VE was carried out in only those 131 data sets in which the value of was >0.9. Area under the curve (AUC) for VE as an intervention in the indeterminate (PPV 8-13%) group was 0.574 (0.49-0.68, 95% CI, < 0.049), and in the observation set with PPV >13, the AUC value was 0.7 (0.59-0.98, 95% CI, < 0.01).
Echocardiography using the suprasternal window in the operating room during abdominal surgery is feasible, but the utility of in stratification of patients with PPV 8-13% is inconclusive.
当脉压变异(PPV)值处于“灰色区域”(8%-13%)时,在预测低血压患者的液体反应性(FR)方面存在局限性。在此类情况下,动态动脉弹性(=PPV/SVV)可用于预测动脉压对容量扩张(VE)的反应。在我们的研究中,我们将通过胸骨上窗计算的升主动脉速度时间积分(AoVTI)的呼吸变异作为每搏量变异(SVV)的替代指标。术中根据 的值对低血压患者给予液体/血管升压药。目的是评估胸骨上超声心动图在上述患者亚组中的可行性和实用性。
在患者出现低血压(收缩压<90 mmHg/<基线值的20%持续5分钟)的所有时间点以及血流动力学稳定时随机选择的时间间隔,使用胸骨上超声心动图监测血流动力学数据并记录AoVTI的呼吸变异。对PPV值为8%-13%且 >0.9的低血压患者给予250 ml乳酸林格液(RL)进行容量扩张。容量扩张后AoVTI增加>15%定义为“液体反应性”。
共纳入28例患者,但因诱导前超声心动图检查发现左心室收缩功能障碍而排除3例。在25例成人患者的538个观察点记录了血流动力学和超声心动图数据。247个数据集中出现低血压,其中168个数据集的PPV值为8%-13%。仅对其中 >0.9的131个数据集进行了容量扩张。在不确定(PPV 8%-13%)组中,作为干预措施的容量扩张的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.574(0.49-0.68,95%CI, <0.049),在PPV>13的观察组中,AUC值为0.7(0.59-0.98,95%CI, <0.01)。
腹部手术期间在手术室使用胸骨上窗进行超声心动图检查是可行的,但 在PPV为8%-13%的患者分层中的实用性尚无定论。