Suppr超能文献

转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌的治疗结果:一项单机构回顾性分析。

Treatment outcomes of metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma: A single institution retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Agarwala Vivek, Ramaswamy Anant, Joshi Amit, Patil Vijay Maruti, Noronha Vanita, Menon Santosh, Popat B Palak, Sable Nilesh, Prabhash Kumar

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

South Asian J Cancer. 2018 Oct-Dec;7(4):226-230. doi: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_22_18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nonclear cell (NCC) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a biologically heterogeneous entity. We report the outcomes of NCC mRCC treated with first-line vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors at our institute. This is first such report from India.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the 40 consecutive patients of NCC mRCC treated between January 2013 and June 2015 in routine clinical practice at our institute. The primary endpoint analyzed was overall survival (OS) with respect to the type of first-line treatment and tumor histology.

RESULTS

The most common histological subtype was papillary in 25 patients (62.5%) followed by sarcomatoid in six (15%), chromophobe in 5 (12.5%), translocation-associated in one patient, and other nonspecified in three patients. First-line treatment was sorafenib in 14 (35%), sunitinib in 9 (22.5%), pazopanib in 8 (20%), everolimus in seven (17.5%), and best-supportive care (BSC) in two (5%) patients. Partial response, stable disease, and progression was observed in six (15%), 13 (32.5%), and nine (22.5%) cases, respectively, as the best response to first-line treatment. The median OS was 11.7 months and median event-free survival was 6.1 months in the whole cohort. The median OS in months for different first-line treatments were as follows: sorafenib (16.2), sunitinib (11.7), pazopanib (not reached, mean-23.9 ± 6.0), everolimus (4.1) and BSC (0.6) and for different histological subtypes were as follows: papillary (9.8), chromophobe (not reached, mean-30.3 ± 8.4), sarcomatoid (4.1), and others (7.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Chromophobe histology has a better outcome compared to other histological subtypes, and anti-VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors are preferable first-line agents compared to mTOR inhibitors.

摘要

引言

非透明细胞(NCC)转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)是一种生物学上异质性的实体。我们报告了我院采用一线血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂或哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mTOR)抑制剂治疗NCC mRCC的结果。这是印度的首份此类报告。

方法

这是一项对2013年1月至2015年6月期间在我院常规临床实践中连续治疗的40例NCC mRCC患者的回顾性分析。分析的主要终点是关于一线治疗类型和肿瘤组织学的总生存期(OS)。

结果

最常见的组织学亚型是乳头状,共25例(62.5%),其次是肉瘤样,6例(15%),嫌色细胞型5例(12.5%),1例为易位相关型,3例为其他未明确型。一线治疗中,14例(35%)使用索拉非尼,9例(22.5%)使用舒尼替尼,8例(20%)使用帕唑帕尼,7例(17.5%)使用依维莫司,2例(5%)使用最佳支持治疗(BSC)。作为一线治疗的最佳反应,分别有6例(15%)、13例(32.5%)和9例(22.5%)观察到部分缓解、疾病稳定和疾病进展。整个队列的中位OS为11.7个月,中位无事件生存期为6.1个月。不同一线治疗的中位OS(月)如下:索拉非尼(16.2)、舒尼替尼(11.7)、帕唑帕尼(未达到,均值-23.9±6.0)、依维莫司(4.1)和BSC(0.6);不同组织学亚型的中位OS(月)如下:乳头状(9.8)、嫌色细胞型(未达到,均值-30.3±8.4)、肉瘤样(4.1)和其他(7.9)。

结论

与其他组织学亚型相比,嫌色细胞组织学的预后更好,与mTOR抑制剂相比,抗VEGF酪氨酸激酶抑制剂是更优选的一线药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e6c/6190394/a05aa0b905e9/SAJC-7-226-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验