Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío", Sevilla, Spain.
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):740-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Clinical data supporting the use of targeted agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are based predominantly on patients with clear cell histology. Little is known about the efficacy of these drugs in non-clear cell variants.
To evaluate the efficacy of different clear cell RCC (ccRCC)-approved targeted agents among patients with non-ccRCC compared with ccRCC.
We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases to identify publications evaluating the outcomes of patients with non-ccRCC treated with targeted agents approved for treatment of ccRCC. Patients with sarcomatoid variant RCC were excluded from the main analysis but were evaluated as an independent cohort. End points of interest were response rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS). Where possible, data were pooled in a meta-analysis. For studies of unselected patients with RCC, the outcomes of patients with non-ccRCC histology were compared with ccRCC. In exploratory analyses, outcomes of non-ccRCC with nonapproved agents were assessed.
A total of 49 studies comprising 7771 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 1244 patients (16.0%) had non-ccRCC, 6300 (83.1%) had ccRCC, and 227 (2.9%) had sarcomatoid tumours. The overall response rate for non-ccRCC with targeted agents was 10.5%. In studies directly comparing non-ccRCC and ccRCC, there were significantly lower response rates for non-ccRCC (odds ratio for response: 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.68; p<0.001). For non-ccRCC treated with targeted agents, median PFS and OS were 7.4 and 13.4 mo, respectively; for patients with ccRCC, these were 10.5 mo and 15.7 mo, respectively (p value for difference<0.001 for both parameters).
Patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) have significantly lower response rates and poorer median progression-free survival and overall survival than those with ccRCC. The optimal treatment of patients with non-ccRCC remains unclear and warrants further study.
Systemic treatments for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tend to be significantly less effective for non-clear cell RCC, with lower response rates and worse progression-free survival and overall survival when compared with clear cell RCC. Optimal therapy remains unclear and warrants further study.
支持将靶向药物用于治疗转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)的临床数据主要基于透明细胞组织学的患者。对于这些药物在非透明细胞变体中的疗效知之甚少。
评估非透明细胞 RCC(非 ccRCC)患者与 ccRCC 患者相比,不同 ccRCC 批准的靶向药物的疗效。
我们系统地检索了电子数据库,以确定评估接受 ccRCC 治疗批准的靶向药物治疗的非 ccRCC 患者结局的出版物。排除肉瘤样变体 RCC 患者进行主要分析,但作为独立队列进行评估。研究的主要终点是反应率、无进展生存期(PFS)的中位数和总生存期(OS)的中位数。在可能的情况下,将数据汇总进行荟萃分析。对于未选择的 RCC 患者的研究,比较了非 ccRCC 组织学患者与 ccRCC 的结局。在探索性分析中,评估了非 ccRCC 与未经批准药物的结果。
共纳入 49 项研究,涉及 7771 名患者。其中,1244 名患者(16.0%)患有非 ccRCC,6300 名患者(83.1%)患有 ccRCC,227 名患者(2.9%)患有肉瘤样肿瘤。非 ccRCC 接受靶向药物治疗的总体反应率为 10.5%。在直接比较非 ccRCC 和 ccRCC 的研究中,非 ccRCC 的反应率明显较低(反应的优势比:0.52;95%置信区间,0.40-0.68;p<0.001)。对于接受靶向药物治疗的非 ccRCC 患者,中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 7.4 和 13.4 个月,对于 ccRCC 患者,分别为 10.5 个月和 15.7 个月(p 值均<0.001)。
非透明细胞肾细胞癌(非 ccRCC)患者的反应率明显较低,中位无进展生存期和总生存期也明显较差,与 ccRCC 患者相比。非 ccRCC 患者的最佳治疗方法仍不清楚,需要进一步研究。
肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的系统治疗对非透明细胞 RCC 效果明显较差,与透明细胞 RCC 相比,反应率较低,无进展生存期和总生存期较差。最佳治疗方法仍不清楚,需要进一步研究。