Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4723-0. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
Uninsurance for young adults (YAs) was greatly reduced by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). However, reforms may not be equally beneficial for all YAs and certain policies may exacerbate, rather than resolve, pre-existing disparities.
To investigate inequalities in YAs' insurance coverage pre- (2000-2010) and post-federal health reforms (dependent coverage expansion, 2010-2013, and Medicaid/Marketplace expansions, 2014-2016), among a nationally representative sample.
A difference-in-differences estimator (controlling for sociodemographics) was used to determine the effects of the ACA for young adults (ages 19-25) compared to adolescents (ages 13-18) and older YA (ages 26-30) counterparts; triple-difference estimators quantified differential policy effects by sociodemographics.
Three hundred eighty-seven thousand six hundred thirty-five participants in the 2000-2016 National Health Interview Survey.
Respondents reported their health insurance coverage types during the last 12 months, reasons uninsured, and detailed sociodemographics.
An adjusted difference-in-differences estimator quantified a 12.3 percentage point increase (p < 0.0001) in full-year coverage post-ACA for YAs compared to older counterparts, driven by increases in employer-sponsored private insurance while younger and older youth saw larger gains in Medicaid coverage. Triple-difference estimators identified subgroups experiencing less beneficial dependent coverage expansion effects, including females, lower socioeconomic status, non-citizens, non-English speakers, and several racial/ethnic minority groups. Later ACA reforms (Marketplace/Medicaid expansions) mitigated many of these widening disparities.
While the ACA significantly impacted YA insurance coverage, these gains were not of equal magnitude for all YAs and disparities remain. As such, more work needs to be done to ensure optimal and equitable access to high-quality, affordable insurance for all YAs.
《平价医疗法案》(ACA)大大降低了年轻人(YAs)的无保险率。然而,改革措施可能对所有年轻人并非都同样有益,某些政策可能会加剧而不是解决先前存在的差异。
在全国代表性样本中,调查年轻人在联邦健康改革之前(2000-2010 年)和之后(2010-2013 年的受抚养人保险范围扩大和 2014-2016 年的医疗补助/市场扩大)的保险覆盖情况的不平等现象。
使用差分差异估计量(控制社会人口统计学因素)来确定 ACA 对年轻人(19-25 岁)与青少年(13-18 岁)和年长的年轻人(26-30 岁)的影响;三重差分估计量按社会人口统计学因素量化了不同政策的影响。
2000-2016 年全国健康访谈调查的 387635 名参与者。
受访者报告了过去 12 个月的健康保险覆盖类型、未参保原因和详细的社会人口统计学信息。
调整后的差分差异估计量量化了 ACA 后年轻人的全年覆盖范围增加了 12.3 个百分点(p<0.0001),这主要是由于雇主赞助的私人保险增加,而年轻和年长的年轻人在医疗补助覆盖范围方面的增幅更大。三重差分估计量确定了受益于受抚养人保险范围扩大的效果较小的亚组,包括女性、较低社会经济地位、非公民、非英语使用者以及几个种族/族裔少数群体。ACA 的后来改革(市场/医疗补助扩大)减轻了许多这些不断扩大的差距。
尽管 ACA 对年轻人的保险覆盖范围产生了重大影响,但并非所有年轻人都获得了同等程度的收益,差距仍然存在。因此,需要做更多的工作来确保所有年轻人都能获得优质、负担得起的保险,并实现最佳和公平的机会。