Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术机械肠道准备的随机对照试验

Randomized controlled trial of mechanical bowel preparation for laparoscopy-assisted colectomy.

作者信息

Mai-Phan Anh T, Nguyen Hai, Nguyen Tin T, Nguyen Dung A, Thai Truc T

机构信息

General surgery department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

General surgery department, Nhan Dan Gia Dinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Oct;12(4):408-411. doi: 10.1111/ases.12671. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before open colon surgery has been debated over the last decade. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of MBP on the outcome of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy.

METHODS

Patients who were scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic colon resection with primary anastomosis were randomly allocated to a preoperative MBP group (either two bottles of sodium phosphate or 2-L polyethylene glycol) or a no-MBP group. Anastomotic leakage and other complications such as surgical-site infection and extra-abdominal complications were recorded postoperatively.

RESULTS

In this study, 122 patients were recruited and randomly allocated to the MBP group (n = 62) or the no-MBP group (n = 60). Demographic and clinical characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The rate of abdominal complications, including anastomotic leak and surgical-site infection, was 16.2% in the MBP group and 18.3% in the no-MBP group (P = 0.747). Anastomotic leakage occurred in four patients (6.5%) in the MBP group and in two patients (3.3%) in no-MBP group (P = 0.680). About 29% of patients in the MBP group still had either liquid or solid content in the bowel. No significant difference was found between the length of hospital stay in the MBP group and the no-MBP group (9.0 ± 2.9 vs 8.4 ± 1.9 days, P = 0.180).

CONCLUSIONS

Elective laparoscopic colectomy without MBP is safe and offers acceptable postoperative morbidity.

摘要

引言

在过去十年中,开放性结肠手术前进行机械性肠道准备(MBP)的益处一直存在争议。这项随机对照试验的目的是评估MBP对接受择期腹腔镜结肠切除术患者预后的影响。

方法

计划接受择期腹腔镜结肠切除并一期吻合的患者被随机分配到术前MBP组(两瓶磷酸钠或2升聚乙二醇)或无MBP组。术后记录吻合口漏及其他并发症,如手术部位感染和腹部外并发症。

结果

本研究共纳入122例患者,随机分为MBP组(n = 62)和无MBP组(n = 60)。两组的人口统计学和临床特征无显著差异。MBP组腹部并发症(包括吻合口漏和手术部位感染)发生率为16.2%,无MBP组为18.3%(P = 0.747)。MBP组有4例患者(6.5%)发生吻合口漏,无MBP组有2例患者(3.3%)发生吻合口漏(P = 0.680)。MBP组约29%的患者肠道内仍有液体或固体内容物。MBP组和无MBP组的住院时间无显著差异(9.0 ± 2.9天 vs 8.4 ± 1.9天,P = 0.180)。

结论

不进行MBP的择期腹腔镜结肠切除术是安全的,术后发病率可接受。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验