Suppr超能文献

与开腹手术相比,直肠癌微创手术显示出良好的结果:一项国家癌症数据库观察性分析

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Shows Promising Outcomes Compared to Laparotomy, a National Cancer Database Observational Analysis.

作者信息

Skancke Matthew, Schoolfield Clint, Umapathi Bindu, Amdur Richard, Brody Fredrick, Obias Vincent

机构信息

1 Department of General Surgery and Colorectal Surgery, George Washington University Hospital , Washington, District of Columbia.

2 Department of General Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):218-224. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0471. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The surgical approach to adenocarcinoma of the rectum remains a controversial topic. Although current data focus on the noninferiority of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for rectal cancer compared with laparotomy, conclusions are drawn from smaller sample sizes and may be underpowered. Methods/Interventions: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010 to 2014 was reviewed for all cases of invasive adenocarcinoma of the rectum (SEER Histology Codes 8140) who underwent surgical resection for malignancy. Groups were separated based on laparotomy or an MIS approach and stratified by NCDB Analytic Stage. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate for survival after diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Results/Outcomes: The inclusion criteria identified 29,199 cases of adenocarcinoma of the rectum managed surgically. After controlling for differences in the cohorts, survival after diagnosis and definitive surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of the rectum is improved when an MIS approach was used (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-0.88, P < .001). The protective effect of an MIS approach applied to Stages I, II, III, and IV adenocarcinoma of the rectum. The protective effect of a minimally invasive surgical approach applies to Stages I, II, III, and IV adenocarcinoma of the rectum. The rate of negative circumferential margins (86.2% versus 83.5%, P < .001), proximal and distal margins (94.7% versus 92.1%, P < .001), and lymph node yield >12 (73.2% versus 70.1%, P < .001) was higher in the minimally invasive group compared with laparotomy. The intraoperative conversion rate from MIS to laparotomy was 13.9%.

CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: Minimally invasive resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum shows promising survival benefit compared with open surgery after adjusting for measured confounds.

摘要

目的/背景:直肠癌的手术方式仍是一个有争议的话题。尽管目前的数据聚焦于与开腹手术相比,微创手术(MIS)治疗直肠癌的非劣效性,但结论是基于较小样本量得出的,可能说服力不足。

方法/干预措施:回顾2010年至2014年国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中所有因恶性肿瘤接受手术切除的直肠浸润性腺癌病例(SEER组织学编码8140)。根据开腹手术或MIS手术方式分组,并按NCDB分析分期进行分层。采用多因素Cox回归分析评估直肠癌诊断后的生存率。

结果/结局:纳入标准确定了29199例接受手术治疗的直肠腺癌病例。在控制队列差异后,采用MIS手术方式时,直肠癌诊断和确定性手术治疗后的生存率有所提高(调整后风险比[HR]=0.82,95%置信区间[CI]=0.77-0.88,P<0.001)。MIS手术方式对直肠I、II、III和IV期腺癌均有保护作用。微创外科手术方式对直肠I、II、III和IV期腺癌均有保护作用。与开腹手术组相比,微创组的环周切缘阴性率(86.2%对83.5%,P<0.001)、近端和远端切缘阴性率(94.7%对92.1%,P<0.001)以及淋巴结获取数>12个的比例(73.2%对70.1%,P<0.001)更高。MIS转为开腹手术的术中转换率为13.9%。

结论/讨论:在调整测量的混杂因素后,与开放手术相比,直肠癌的微创切除显示出有前景的生存获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验